Skip to content
Compare Crawley vs Cheltenham

Crawley vs Cheltenham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Crawley vs Cheltenham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Crawley Crawley Home Team
Cheltenham Cheltenham Away Team
Crawley
40.6
W L L W L L W D D D

Last 10 Matches

Cheltenham
39.4
L W L L W W L L L W

Performance Radar

Crawley
Cheltenham

Categories Won

5

Crawley

3

Draw

7

Cheltenham

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Richards (1 goals)
G. Miller (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.0

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 45.0

43.8

League Difficulty: 42.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.8

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.1

1.52

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
40.6

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 62.7, Form: 28.2

39.4

Attack: 50.0, Defense: 31.3, Form: 37.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

2
Crawley
Cheltenham
Crawley

Power Rating Breakdown

40.6

Overall

Attack 28.2
Defense 62.7
Form 28.2
Consistency 53.2
Cheltenham

Power Rating Breakdown

39.4

Overall

Attack 50.0
Defense 31.3
Form 37.5
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.5 vs 42.0

Opponent Quality

45.0 vs 45.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Crawley logo Crawley
W
Rochdale (38%)
L
Crewe (46%)
L
Watford (40%)
W
York (47%)
L
Reading (51%)
L
Oxford U (59%)
W
Eastleigh (42%)
D
Salford (46%)
Cheltenham logo Cheltenham
L
Swindon (39%)
W
Rotherham (38%)
L
Charlton (49%)
L
MK Dons (41%)
W
Slimbridge (49%)
W
Evesham Utd (43%)
L
Colchester (45%)
L
Bristol R (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Rochdale A
2 - 1 W
38%
Crewe H
0 - 1 L
46%
Watford A
0 - 1 L
40%
York A
2 - 0 W
47%
Reading H
0 - 1 L
51%
Oxford U A
1 - 3 L
59%
Eastleigh A
1 - 0 W
42%
Salford H
0 - 0 D
46%
Accrington A
3 - 3 D
48%
Shrewsbury H
0 - 0 D
33%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Swindon A
1 - 2 L
39%
Rotherham H
2 - 1 W
38%
Charlton H
1 - 3 L
49%
MK Dons H
0 - 2 L
41%
Slimbridge A
6 - 1 W
49%
Evesham Utd A
3 - 0 W
43%
Colchester H
1 - 4 L
45%
Bristol R A
0 - 4 L
58%
Tranmere H
1 - 3 L
44%
Newport H
1 - 0 W
44%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 44.0 vs 43.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Cheltenham holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Crawley's 0.9, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Crawley — 1.0 goals conceded per game and 4 clean sheets put them well ahead of Cheltenham, who give up 2.0 goals per match at the other end.

Crawley has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cheltenham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Crawley's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Crawley

Crawley

VS
Cheltenham

Cheltenham

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Crawley

3W 3D 4L · 9 goals scored · 10 conceded

Cheltenham

4W 0D 6L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or