C Palace vs Newcastle Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare C Palace vs Newcastle: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
C Palace
Home Team
Newcastle
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
C Palace
Draw
Newcastle
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
3W, 3D, 4L
16 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
-1
-2
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 74.8, Opponent Quality: 61.4
League Difficulty: 60.9, Opponent Quality: 51.6
0W / 4 matches
1W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.03
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.02
Attack: 54.1, Defense: 43.9, Form: 40.6
Attack: 58.7, Defense: 50.9, Form: 35.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
C Palace
Newcastle
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
Context matters here: Newcastle's schedule strength (SoS: 67.4) has been notably more demanding than C Palace's (SoS: 51.4), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
The attacking output of C Palace and Newcastle is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.5 goals per game respectively.
Defensively, C Palace and Newcastle are evenly matched, allowing 1.7 and 1.7 goals per game respectively.
C Palace has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Newcastle's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
C Palace
Newcastle
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
C Palace
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded
Newcastle
3W 3D 4L · 15 goals scored · 17 conceded
Popular Teams