Skip to content
Compare Čukarički vs Železničar P

Čukarički vs Železničar P Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Čukarički vs Železničar P: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Čukarički Čukarički Home Team
Železničar P Železničar P Away Team
Čukarički
41.7
W L D D L L D D D D

Last 10 Matches

Železničar P
48.9
L W D D D W D D L W

Performance Radar

Čukarički
Železničar P

Categories Won

3

Čukarički

2

Draw

10

Železničar P

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 6D, 3L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Tedić (2 goals)
N. Jovanović (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

54.9

League Difficulty: 57.3, Opponent Quality: 53.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.7

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: 0.0

1.16

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
41.7

Attack: 24.6, Defense: 77.2, Form: 10.5

48.9

Attack: 42.0, Defense: 69.9, Form: 31.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

5
Čukarički
Železničar P
Čukarički

Power Rating Breakdown

41.7

Overall

Attack 24.6
Defense 77.2
Form 10.5
Consistency 79.3
Železničar P

Power Rating Breakdown

48.9

Overall

Attack 42.0
Defense 69.9
Form 31.5
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 57.3

Opponent Quality

55.5 vs 53.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Čukarički logo Čukarički
W
Radnički Niš (56%)
L
FK IMT (66%)
D
Železničar P (58%)
D
Partizan (61%)
L
Vojvodina (58%)
L
Red Star (65%)
D
Novi Pazar (42%)
D
OFK (52%)
Železničar P logo Železničar P
L
Braga (61%)
W
Radnički Niš (51%)
D
Čukarički (46%)
D
Novi Pazar (42%)
D
Radnik (45%)
W
OFK (47%)
D
Vojvodina (58%)
D
Red Star (65%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Radnički Niš A
2 - 0 W
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
66%
Železničar P A
0 - 0 D
58%
Partizan H
0 - 0 D
61%
Vojvodina A
0 - 1 L
58%
Red Star H
1 - 2 L
65%
Novi Pazar A
2 - 2 D
42%
OFK A
0 - 0 D
52%
Radnik H
2 - 2 D
45%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Braga H
0 - 1 L
61%
Radnički Niš H
2 - 1 W
51%
Čukarički H
0 - 0 D
46%
Novi Pazar A
2 - 2 D
42%
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
45%
OFK H
2 - 0 W
47%
Vojvodina A
0 - 0 D
58%
Red Star H
2 - 2 D
65%
Partizan A
1 - 2 L
66%
Javor A
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 55.3 vs 54.9), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Železničar P holds the attacking edge with 1.2 goals per match versus Čukarički's 0.7, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, Čukarički and Železničar P are evenly matched, allowing 0.8 and 1.0 goals per game respectively.

Čukarički has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Železničar P has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 1.9 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Čukarički is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Železničar P. In practical terms, Železničar P would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Železničar P, with a 7.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Serbian Super Liga (2026-05-22). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Čukarički

Čukarički

VS
Železničar P

Železničar P

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Čukarički

1W 6D 3L · 7 goals scored · 8 conceded

Železničar P

3W 5D 2L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or