Skip to content
Compare Cumbernauld C. vs Bo'ness Utd

Cumbernauld C. vs Bo'ness Utd Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cumbernauld C. vs Bo'ness Utd: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cumbernauld C. Cumbernauld C. Home Team
Bo'ness Utd Bo'ness Utd Away Team
Cumbernauld C.
38.4
D D L L D W L W W D

Last 10 Matches

Bo'ness Utd
38.7
D W W L W L D D L D

Performance Radar

Cumbernauld C.
Bo'ness Utd

Categories Won

3

Cumbernauld C.

7

Draw

5

Bo'ness Utd

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

0

0

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Jack (5 goals)
K. Mitchell (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
29.0

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 30.3

31.5

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 35.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.48

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.72

1.38

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.32

Adjusted Power Rating
38.4

Attack: 57.9, Defense: 21.1, Form: 23.7

38.7

Attack: 46.2, Defense: 35.3, Form: 24.4

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
7

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

3
7

76-90+'

4
Cumbernauld C.
Bo'ness Utd
Cumbernauld C.

Power Rating Breakdown

38.4

Overall

Attack 57.9
Defense 21.1
Form 23.7
Consistency 57.7
Bo'ness Utd

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 46.2
Defense 35.3
Form 24.4
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

27.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

30.3 vs 35.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cumbernauld C. logo Cumbernauld C.
D
Dalbeattie (21%)
D
Gretna (22%)
L
QOTS (43%)
L
Auchinleck (45%)
D
Renfrew (22%)
W
Stirling Unv (12%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (43%)
W
Gretna (17%)
Bo'ness Utd logo Bo'ness Utd
D
Musselburgh (30%)
W
Strollers (25%)
W
Gala (32%)
L
Berwick (40%)
W
Cumbernauld C. (38%)
L
Gala (32%)
D
Tranent (55%)
D
Cowdenbeath (34%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dalbeattie H
2 - 2 D
21%
Gretna A
3 - 3 D
22%
QOTS A
0 - 4 L
43%
Auchinleck A
0 - 1 L
45%
Renfrew H
2 - 2 D
22%
Stirling Unv H
4 - 1 W
12%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 3 L
43%
Gretna H
3 - 1 W
17%
Berwick A
3 - 2 W
40%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 3 D
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Musselburgh A
2 - 2 D
30%
Strollers H
2 - 0 W
25%
Gala A
3 - 1 W
32%
Berwick A
2 - 4 L
40%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 2 W
38%
Gala A
1 - 3 L
32%
Tranent A
1 - 1 D
55%
Cowdenbeath H
1 - 1 D
34%
Strollers A
0 - 1 L
30%
Celtic H
2 - 2 D
43%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 29.0 vs 31.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, Cumbernauld C. outperforms Bo'ness Utd with 2.2 goals per match to 1.7, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Bo'ness Utd's backline outperforms Cumbernauld C.'s, with 1.7 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.

Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bo'ness Utd has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Bo'ness Utd's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-04-11), Bo'ness Utd prevailed 3-2 against Cumbernauld C.. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Bo'ness Utd secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Cumbernauld C. will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Bo'ness Utd will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cumbernauld C.

Cumbernauld C.

VS
Bo'ness Utd

Bo'ness Utd

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cumbernauld C.

3W 4D 3L · 22 goals scored · 22 conceded

Bo'ness Utd

3W 4D 3L · 17 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or