Skip to content
Compare Degerfors vs ZW

Degerfors vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Degerfors vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Degerfors Degerfors Home Team
ZW ZW Away Team
Degerfors
40.7
L D L D L D D W L W

Last 10 Matches

ZW
59.7
W W W W W D W L L L

Performance Radar

Degerfors
ZW

Categories Won

1

Degerfors

2

Draw

12

ZW

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Rafferty (2 goals)
J. Opoku (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.1

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

54.6

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
40.7

Attack: 39.6, Defense: 52.9, Form: 19.8

59.7

Attack: 59.3, Defense: 66.2, Form: 62.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

5
4

76-90+'

3
Degerfors
ZW
Degerfors

Power Rating Breakdown

40.7

Overall

Attack 39.6
Defense 52.9
Form 19.8
Consistency 64.0
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 59.3
Defense 66.2
Form 62.8
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

48.5 vs 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Degerfors logo Degerfors
L
Malmö (48%)
D
Brommapojkarna (49%)
L
Kalmar (51%)
D
GAIS (60%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
D
Häcken (57%)
D
Örgryte (33%)
W
AIK (44%)
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (32%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (49%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (63%)
L
Gent (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Malmö H
0 - 1 L
48%
Brommapojkarna H
2 - 2 D
49%
Kalmar A
1 - 2 L
51%
GAIS A
1 - 1 D
60%
Mjällby H
1 - 4 L
54%
Häcken H
1 - 1 D
57%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
33%
AIK H
2 - 1 W
44%
Elfsborg H
0 - 1 L
51%
Halmstad A
3 - 0 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
32%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
49%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
63%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
64%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.1 vs 54.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

ZW holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Degerfors's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Degerfors conceding 1.4 and ZW conceding 1.1 per match.

Degerfors has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

ZW emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (59.7 vs 40.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Degerfors

Degerfors

VS
ZW

ZW

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Degerfors

2W 4D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded

ZW

6W 1D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or