Skip to content
Compare Dorking vs Maidenhead

Dorking vs Maidenhead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dorking vs Maidenhead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dorking Dorking Home Team
Maidenhead Maidenhead Away Team
Dorking
36.1
W L W D L L L L W D

Last 10 Matches

Maidenhead
42.6
L L D W D W D W L W

Performance Radar

Dorking
Maidenhead

Categories Won

6

Dorking

2

Draw

7

Maidenhead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. McCallum (2 goals)
J. Umerah (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.2

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 44.3

34.4

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 36.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.14

0.81

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.39

Adjusted Power Rating
36.1

Attack: 41.6, Defense: 32.7, Form: 26.8

42.6

Attack: 33.8, Defense: 59.1, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

2
Dorking
Maidenhead
Dorking

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 41.6
Defense 32.7
Form 26.8
Consistency 49.3
Maidenhead

Power Rating Breakdown

42.6

Overall

Attack 33.8
Defense 59.1
Form 33.8
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

44.3 vs 36.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Dorking logo Dorking
W
Lewes (46%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
L
Bath (33%)
L
Totton (43%)
L
Worthing (54%)
L
Horsham (38%)
Maidenhead logo Maidenhead
L
Wolves (33%)
L
Dorking (39%)
D
Hornchurch (58%)
W
Dover (20%)
D
Chelmsford (45%)
W
Hampton & RB (39%)
D
Slough (26%)
W
Bath (33%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lewes A
2 - 1 W
46%
Torquay A
2 - 4 L
53%
Maidenhead H
2 - 0 W
43%
Weston-s-Mare A
1 - 1 D
40%
Bath H
1 - 3 L
33%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 2 L
54%
Horsham A
0 - 3 L
38%
Hemel H H
2 - 1 W
40%
Torquay A
2 - 2 D
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wolves H
0 - 1 L
33%
Dorking A
0 - 2 L
39%
Hornchurch A
0 - 0 D
58%
Dover H
1 - 0 W
20%
Chelmsford A
1 - 1 D
45%
Hampton & RB H
2 - 1 W
39%
Slough A
2 - 2 D
26%
Bath H
3 - 0 W
33%
Weston-s-Mare H
1 - 2 L
36%
Dorking H
2 - 0 W
34%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 39.2 vs 34.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Dorking (1.4 goals per match) and Maidenhead (1.2 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Maidenhead holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.9 goals per game and recording 4 clean sheets, compared to Dorking's leaky backline that surrenders 1.9 goals per match.

Dorking has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Maidenhead has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.7 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Maidenhead has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Maidenhead. In practical terms, Maidenhead would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Maidenhead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-29), Dorking prevailed 2-0 against Maidenhead. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Dorking secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Maidenhead will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Dorking will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent National League N / S match (2026-03-21), Maidenhead prevailed 2-0 against Dorking. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Maidenhead secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Dorking will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Maidenhead will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dorking

Dorking

VS
Maidenhead

Maidenhead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Dorking

3W 2D 5L · 14 goals scored · 19 conceded

Maidenhead

4W 3D 3L · 12 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or