Skip to content
Compare Dover vs Bath

Dover vs Bath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dover vs Bath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dover Dover Home Team
Bath Bath Away Team
Dover
26.3
L D L L L L L L W L

Last 10 Matches

Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Performance Radar

Dover
Bath

Categories Won

1

Dover

3

Draw

11

Bath

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-15

-15

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Nikaj (5 goals)
S. Wilson (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.7

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 45.1

40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.65

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.15

1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
26.3

Attack: 23.9, Defense: 20.9, Form: 9.0

36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
Dover
Bath
Dover

Power Rating Breakdown

26.3

Overall

Attack 23.9
Defense 20.9
Form 9.0
Consistency 74.8
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

45.1 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Dover logo Dover
L
Gillingham (45%)
D
Chesham (43%)
L
Maidenhead (48%)
L
Farnborough (43%)
L
Ebbsfleet (48%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
L
Salisbury (46%)
L
Enfield T (38%)
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gillingham H
0 - 3 L
45%
Chesham H
2 - 2 D
43%
Maidenhead A
0 - 1 L
48%
Farnborough H
1 - 3 L
43%
Ebbsfleet A
0 - 4 L
48%
Maidstone H
0 - 2 L
57%
Salisbury A
1 - 2 L
46%
Enfield T A
1 - 3 L
38%
Chelmsford A
2 - 1 W
45%
Chippenham H
1 - 2 L
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 39.7 vs 40.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Bath holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Dover's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, Dover and Bath are evenly matched, allowing 2.3 and 2.2 goals per game respectively.

Dover has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Dover is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Bath faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.2 goals per match. If Dover can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 74% win probability for Bath. In practical terms, Bath would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Bath has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dover

Dover

VS
Bath

Bath

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Dover

1W 1D 8L · 8 goals scored · 23 conceded

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or