Skip to content
Compare Dynamo Kyiv vs Kharkiv

Dynamo Kyiv vs Kharkiv Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dynamo Kyiv vs Kharkiv: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dynamo Kyiv Dynamo Kyiv Home Team
Kharkiv Kharkiv Away Team
Dynamo Kyiv
66.4
L D D W W W D L W W

Last 10 Matches

Kharkiv
38.5
L L D L W D D D L D

Performance Radar

Dynamo Kyiv
Kharkiv

Categories Won

12

Dynamo Kyiv

3

Draw

0

Kharkiv

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Ponomarenko (4 goals)
P. Itodo (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
73.4

League Difficulty: 94.1, Opponent Quality: 71.6

52.1

League Difficulty: 76.8, Opponent Quality: 61.0

Elite Opponent Record
43%

3W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.23

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.33

1.21

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
66.4

Attack: 78.2, Defense: 65.8, Form: 61.7

38.5

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 54.5, Form: 10.2

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

5

61-75'

3
5

76-90+'

Dynamo Kyiv
Kharkiv
Dynamo Kyiv

Power Rating Breakdown

66.4

Overall

Attack 78.2
Defense 65.8
Form 61.7
Consistency 53.2
Kharkiv

Power Rating Breakdown

38.5

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 54.5
Form 10.2
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

94.1 vs 76.8

Opponent Quality

71.6 vs 61.0

Elite Opponent Record

43% vs 0%
Dynamo Kyiv logo Dynamo Kyiv
L
PAOK (65%)
D
U Cluj (80%)
D
U Cluj (78%)
W
Kudrivka (64%)
W
SK Poltava (54%)
W
Kolos (80%)
D
LNZ Cherkasy (70%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
Kharkiv logo Kharkiv
L
Schalke 04 (53%)
L
Fagiano (39%)
D
Hradec Kr. (60%)
L
Jablonec (39%)
W
Veres Rivne (56%)
D
Epitsentr (67%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (78%)
D
Zorya (75%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK H
2 - 3 L
65%
U Cluj A
0 - 0 D
80%
U Cluj H
0 - 0 D
78%
Kudrivka H
3 - 2 W
64%
SK Poltava A
2 - 0 W
54%
Kolos H
2 - 1 W
80%
LNZ Cherkasy A
0 - 0 D
70%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 2 L
78%
Kryvbas KR A
6 - 5 W
77%
Zorya H
3 - 1 W
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Schalke 04 H
0 - 2 L
53%
Fagiano H
1 - 2 L
39%
Hradec Kr. A
3 - 3 D
60%
Jablonec A
0 - 1 L
39%
Veres Rivne A
1 - 0 W
56%
Epitsentr H
1 - 1 D
67%
Karpaty Lviv H
2 - 2 D
78%
Zorya A
1 - 1 D
75%
Polissya H
0 - 1 L
73%
LNZ Cherkasy A
1 - 1 D
70%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Context matters here: Dynamo Kyiv's schedule strength (SoS: 73.4) has been notably more demanding than Kharkiv's (SoS: 52.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Dynamo Kyiv leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.9 goals per game compared to Kharkiv's 1.0 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Dynamo Kyiv and Kharkiv are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.4 goals per game respectively.

Dynamo Kyiv has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 3 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Kharkiv has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Dynamo Kyiv has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Kharkiv is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Dynamo Kyiv is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Kharkiv shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Dynamo Kyiv faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Kharkiv can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 27.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Dynamo Kyiv. In practical terms, Dynamo Kyiv would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Dynamo Kyiv holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 66.4 against 38.5 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dynamo Kyiv

Dynamo Kyiv

VS
Kharkiv

Kharkiv

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Dynamo Kyiv

5W 3D 2L · 19 goals scored · 14 conceded

Kharkiv

1W 5D 4L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or