Skip to content
Compare Eastbourne vs Tonbridge

Eastbourne vs Tonbridge Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Eastbourne vs Tonbridge: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Eastbourne Eastbourne Home Team
Tonbridge Tonbridge Away Team
Eastbourne
30.5
W L L D L D L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Tonbridge
45.3
W D L L W W D L L W

Performance Radar

Eastbourne
Tonbridge

Categories Won

0

Eastbourne

6

Draw

9

Tonbridge

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Quevin Castro (3 goals)
T. Leahy (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.3

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 43.8

38.6

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 41.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.19

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.11

1.72

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: +0.18

Adjusted Power Rating
30.5

Attack: 38.3, Defense: 20.6, Form: 8.8

45.3

Attack: 56.1, Defense: 44.3, Form: 35.4

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

3
Eastbourne
Tonbridge
Eastbourne

Power Rating Breakdown

30.5

Overall

Attack 38.3
Defense 20.6
Form 8.8
Consistency 74.5
Tonbridge

Power Rating Breakdown

45.3

Overall

Attack 56.1
Defense 44.3
Form 35.4
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

43.8 vs 41.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Eastbourne logo Eastbourne
W
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Totton (38%)
L
Hemel H (45%)
D
Tonbridge (42%)
L
Worthing (60%)
D
Bath (33%)
L
Chippenham (43%)
L
Maidenhead (43%)
Tonbridge logo Tonbridge
W
Dulwich Hamlet (42%)
D
Sittingbourne (45%)
L
Sutton (36%)
L
Torquay (48%)
W
Farnborough (48%)
W
Salisbury (41%)
D
Eastbourne (29%)
L
Ebbsfleet (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chelmsford A
3 - 1 W
45%
Totton H
2 - 3 L
38%
Hemel H A
1 - 3 L
45%
Tonbridge H
1 - 1 D
42%
Worthing A
1 - 2 L
60%
Bath H
2 - 2 D
33%
Chippenham A
2 - 5 L
43%
Maidenhead H
0 - 1 L
43%
Ebbsfleet H
1 - 3 L
43%
Salisbury A
0 - 2 L
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dulwich Hamlet H
3 - 1 W
42%
Sittingbourne H
2 - 2 D
45%
Sutton H
0 - 2 L
36%
Torquay H
1 - 2 L
48%
Farnborough A
6 - 1 W
48%
Salisbury H
3 - 2 W
41%
Eastbourne A
1 - 1 D
29%
Ebbsfleet H
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham A
0 - 1 L
48%
Bath H
2 - 1 W
33%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (38.3 vs 38.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Tonbridge holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Eastbourne's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Tonbridge's backline outperforms Eastbourne's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.3.

Eastbourne has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tonbridge has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Eastbourne is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Tonbridge is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Eastbourne shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Tonbridge faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Eastbourne can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 14.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Tonbridge. In practical terms, Tonbridge would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Tonbridge holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.8-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the National League N / S (2026-04-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Eastbourne

Eastbourne

VS
Tonbridge

Tonbridge

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Eastbourne

1W 2D 7L · 13 goals scored · 23 conceded

Tonbridge

4W 2D 4L · 19 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or