Skip to content
Compare Enfield T vs Hampton & RB

Enfield T vs Hampton & RB Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Enfield T vs Hampton & RB: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Enfield T Enfield T Home Team
Hampton & RB Hampton & RB Away Team
Enfield T
36.0
D L W L D L L D W L

Last 10 Matches

Hampton & RB
39.2
D W L D L W L W L W

Performance Radar

Enfield T
Hampton & RB

Categories Won

1

Enfield T

3

Draw

11

Hampton & RB

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Youngs (3 goals)
D. Nkrumah (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.4

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.3

36.7

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.94

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.36

1.01

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
36.0

Attack: 37.9, Defense: 40.8, Form: 17.5

39.2

Attack: 37.6, Defense: 43.4, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

6
4

76-90+'

1
Enfield T
Hampton & RB
Enfield T

Power Rating Breakdown

36.0

Overall

Attack 37.9
Defense 40.8
Form 17.5
Consistency 61.3
Hampton & RB

Power Rating Breakdown

39.2

Overall

Attack 37.6
Defense 43.4
Form 34.7
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 40.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Enfield T logo Enfield T
D
Worthing (60%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
W
Slough (21%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Hemel H (40%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Worthing (54%)
Hampton & RB logo Hampton & RB
D
Chertsey (49%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
L
Ebbsfleet (48%)
D
Chippenham (38%)
L
Maidenhead (48%)
W
Farnborough (43%)
L
Dag & Red (44%)
W
Horsham (33%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
60%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 1 L
44%
Slough H
5 - 2 W
21%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Hemel H H
0 - 0 D
40%
Chelmsford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Chesham H
3 - 4 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
54%
Dover H
3 - 1 W
20%
Salisbury A
0 - 2 L
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chertsey A
1 - 1 D
49%
Enfield T H
1 - 0 W
33%
Ebbsfleet A
0 - 4 L
48%
Chippenham H
1 - 1 D
38%
Maidenhead A
1 - 2 L
48%
Farnborough H
3 - 1 W
43%
Dag & Red A
1 - 3 L
44%
Horsham H
2 - 0 W
33%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 2 L
40%
Slough A
3 - 1 W
26%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 37.4 vs 36.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Enfield T averaging 1.3 and Hampton & RB averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Enfield T conceding 1.6 and Hampton & RB conceding 1.5 per match.

Enfield T has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Hampton & RB has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Hampton & RB has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Enfield T is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Hampton & RB faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Enfield T can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Enfield T's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-25), Hampton & RB prevailed 1-0 against Enfield T. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Hampton & RB secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Enfield T will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Hampton & RB will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Enfield T

Enfield T

VS
Hampton & RB

Hampton & RB

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Enfield T

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded

Hampton & RB

4W 2D 4L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or