Skip to content
Compare Enfield T vs Hemel H

Enfield T vs Hemel H Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Enfield T vs Hemel H: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Enfield T Enfield T Home Team
Hemel H Hemel H Away Team
Enfield T
36.0
D L W L D L L D W L

Last 10 Matches

Hemel H
40.4
L D D W W D L D L W

Performance Radar

Enfield T
Hemel H

Categories Won

4

Enfield T

3

Draw

8

Hemel H

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Youngs (3 goals)
R. Campbell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.4

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.3

36.6

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.94

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.36

0.85

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
36.0

Attack: 37.9, Defense: 40.8, Form: 17.5

40.4

Attack: 31.8, Defense: 57.7, Form: 26.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Enfield T
Hemel H
Enfield T

Power Rating Breakdown

36.0

Overall

Attack 37.9
Defense 40.8
Form 17.5
Consistency 61.3
Hemel H

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 31.8
Defense 57.7
Form 26.0
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 40.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Enfield T logo Enfield T
D
Worthing (60%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
W
Slough (21%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Hemel H (40%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Worthing (54%)
Hemel H logo Hemel H
L
Wealdstone (48%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (36%)
D
Salisbury (41%)
W
Torquay (53%)
W
Eastbourne (24%)
D
Enfield T (38%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
60%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 1 L
44%
Slough H
5 - 2 W
21%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Hemel H H
0 - 0 D
40%
Chelmsford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Chesham H
3 - 4 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 1 D
54%
Dover H
3 - 1 W
20%
Salisbury A
0 - 2 L
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wealdstone A
0 - 1 L
48%
Weston-s-Mare H
1 - 1 D
36%
Salisbury H
1 - 1 D
41%
Torquay A
2 - 1 W
53%
Eastbourne H
3 - 1 W
24%
Enfield T A
0 - 0 D
38%
Chesham H
0 - 3 L
43%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 0 D
40%
Dorking A
1 - 2 L
39%
Bath A
3 - 0 W
38%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 37.4 vs 36.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Enfield T (1.3 goals per match) and Hemel H (1.1 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Hemel H's backline outperforms Enfield T's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.

Enfield T has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Hemel H has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Enfield T is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: Enfield T's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the National League N / S (2026-04-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Enfield T

Enfield T

VS
Hemel H

Hemel H

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Enfield T

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 16 conceded

Hemel H

3W 4D 3L · 11 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or