Epitsentr vs ZTE Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Epitsentr vs ZTE: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Epitsentr
Home Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Epitsentr
Draw
ZTE
Statistical Comparison
2W, 6D, 2L
2W, 0D, 0L
13 / 10 matches
4 / 2 matches
13 / 10 matches
1 / 2 matches
0
+3
2 / 10 matches
1 / 2 matches
4 / 10 matches
1 / 2 matches
6 / 10 matches
1 / 2 matches
1W / 4 matches
2W / 2 matches
1W / 6 matches
0W / 0 matches
League Difficulty: 76.8, Opponent Quality: 54.9
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 44.0
1W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.01
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.02
Attack: 54.1, Defense: 70.8, Form: 25.0
Attack: 62.9, Defense: 78.7, Form: 94.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Epitsentr
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Epitsentr has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 74.9 against considerably stronger competition than ZTE (SoS: 44.4). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
ZTE holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Epitsentr's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for ZTE — 0.5 goals conceded per game and 1 clean sheets put them well ahead of Epitsentr, who give up 1.3 goals per match at the other end.
ZTE has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
ZTE has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 2.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Epitsentr is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: ZTE is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 2 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, ZTE faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Epitsentr can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 29.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for ZTE. In practical terms, ZTE would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
ZTE emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (81.9 vs 52.1) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-17), ZTE prevailed 1-0 against Epitsentr. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. ZTE secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Epitsentr will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. ZTE will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Epitsentr
ZTE
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Epitsentr
2W 6D 2L · 13 goals scored · 13 conceded
ZTE
2W 0D 0L · 4 goals scored · 1 conceded
Popular Teams