Excelsior vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Excelsior vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Excelsior
Home Team
NAC
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Excelsior
Draw
NAC
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
2W, 3D, 5L
20 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
+5
-10
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 4 matches
3W / 6 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 58.0
League Difficulty: 73.0, Opponent Quality: 58.8
0W / 2 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.44
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.23
Attack: 67.3, Defense: 50.4, Form: 40.4
Attack: 33.3, Defense: 33.3, Form: 20.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Excelsior
NAC
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (50.9 vs 49.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Excelsior possess a formidable attacking unit, with D. Sanches Fernandes accounting for 5 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.0 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.
Defensively, Excelsior holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against NAC's 2.0.
NAC has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Excelsior has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: NAC is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Excelsior faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If NAC can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 19.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Excelsior. In practical terms, Excelsior would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Excelsior in this contest. Their superior power rating of 52.5, compared to 33.5 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-18), Excelsior prevailed 1-3 against NAC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Excelsior achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against NAC shows genuine quality and mental strength. NAC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Excelsior will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Excelsior
NAC
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Excelsior
4W 3D 3L · 20 goals scored · 15 conceded
NAC
2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 20 conceded
Popular Teams