Finland vs Lithuania Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Finland vs Lithuania: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Finland
Home Team
Lithuania
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Finland
Draw
Lithuania
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 6L
1W, 3D, 6L
11 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
-6
-13
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 7 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 82.0, Opponent Quality: 64.0
League Difficulty: 83.0, Opponent Quality: 62.8
0W / 5 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.22
Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.09
Attack: 38.6, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6
Attack: 21.0, Defense: 38.6, Form: 10.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Finland
Lithuania
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.2 vs 55.2), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Finland outperforms Lithuania with 1.1 goals per match to 0.6, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Finland giving up 1.7 and Lithuania giving up 1.9 per fixture.
Finland has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Lithuania has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Statistical modeling projects 2.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Lithuania is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Finland faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Lithuania can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 9.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Finland. In practical terms, Finland would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
Finland has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - European (2025-10-09): Finland defeated Lithuania 2-1. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Finland's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Lithuania. Finland secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Lithuania will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Finland will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Finland
Lithuania
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Finland
3W 1D 6L · 11 goals scored · 17 conceded
Lithuania
1W 3D 6L · 6 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams