Skip to content
Compare Finland vs Lithuania

Finland vs Lithuania Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Finland vs Lithuania: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Finland Finland Home Team
Lithuania Lithuania Away Team
Finland
39.3
L L D W W L L W L L

Last 10 Matches

Lithuania
30.3
L W L D L L L D L D

Performance Radar

Finland
Lithuania

Categories Won

9

Finland

3

Draw

3

Lithuania

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-13

-13

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Källman (2 goals)
G. Gineitis (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
14%

1W / 7 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.2

League Difficulty: 82.0, Opponent Quality: 64.0

55.2

League Difficulty: 83.0, Opponent Quality: 62.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.22

0.69

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
39.3

Attack: 38.6, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

30.3

Attack: 21.0, Defense: 38.6, Form: 10.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

1
Finland
Lithuania
Finland

Power Rating Breakdown

39.3

Overall

Attack 38.6
Defense 45.6
Form 31.6
Consistency 46.0
Lithuania

Power Rating Breakdown

30.3

Overall

Attack 21.0
Defense 38.6
Form 10.5
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

82.0 vs 83.0

Opponent Quality

64.0 vs 62.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Finland logo Finland
L
Hungary (72%)
L
Germany (87%)
D
Cape Verde (66%)
W
New Zealand (48%)
W
Andorra (46%)
L
Malta (52%)
L
Netherlands (79%)
W
Lithuania (46%)
Lithuania logo Lithuania
L
Georgia (54%)
W
Moldova (42%)
L
Netherlands (79%)
D
Israel (64%)
L
Poland (69%)
L
Finland (58%)
L
Netherlands (74%)
D
Malta (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hungary A
1 - 2 L
72%
Germany A
0 - 4 L
87%
Cape Verde A
1 - 1 D
66%
New Zealand A
2 - 0 W
48%
Andorra H
4 - 0 W
46%
Malta H
0 - 1 L
52%
Netherlands A
0 - 4 L
79%
Lithuania H
2 - 1 W
46%
Poland A
1 - 3 L
74%
Norway A
0 - 1 L
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Georgia H
0 - 2 L
54%
Moldova A
2 - 0 W
42%
Netherlands A
0 - 4 L
79%
Israel H
0 - 0 D
64%
Poland H
0 - 2 L
69%
Finland A
1 - 2 L
58%
Netherlands H
2 - 3 L
74%
Malta H
1 - 1 D
52%
Denmark A
0 - 5 L
79%
Malta A
0 - 0 D
57%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.2 vs 55.2), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Offensively, Finland outperforms Lithuania with 1.1 goals per match to 0.6, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Finland giving up 1.7 and Lithuania giving up 1.9 per fixture.

Finland has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Lithuania has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 2.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Lithuania is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Finland faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Lithuania can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Finland. In practical terms, Finland would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Finland has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - European (2025-10-09): Finland defeated Lithuania 2-1. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Finland's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Lithuania. Finland secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Lithuania will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Finland will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Finland

Finland

VS
Lithuania

Lithuania

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Finland

3W 1D 6L · 11 goals scored · 17 conceded

Lithuania

1W 3D 6L · 6 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or