Skip to content
Compare Finland vs Norway

Finland vs Norway Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Finland vs Norway: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Finland Finland Home Team
Norway Norway Away Team
Finland
39.3
L L D W W L L W L L

Last 10 Matches

Norway
59.8
L W W L W W D W D L

Performance Radar

Finland
Norway

Categories Won

2

Finland

1

Draw

12

Norway

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Källman (2 goals)
E. Haaland (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
14%

1W / 7 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.2

League Difficulty: 82.0, Opponent Quality: 64.0

66.4

League Difficulty: 83.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.22

2.37

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.57

Adjusted Power Rating
39.3

Attack: 38.6, Defense: 45.6, Form: 31.6

59.8

Attack: 69.8, Defense: 58.2, Form: 58.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

4

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

5
Finland
Norway
Finland

Power Rating Breakdown

39.3

Overall

Attack 38.6
Defense 45.6
Form 31.6
Consistency 46.0
Norway

Power Rating Breakdown

59.8

Overall

Attack 69.8
Defense 58.2
Form 58.2
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

82.0 vs 83.0

Opponent Quality

64.0 vs 71.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%
Finland logo Finland
L
Hungary (72%)
L
Germany (87%)
D
Cape Verde (66%)
W
New Zealand (48%)
W
Andorra (46%)
L
Malta (52%)
L
Netherlands (79%)
W
Lithuania (46%)
Norway logo Norway
L
England (80%)
W
Brazil (80%)
W
Ivory Coast (78%)
L
France (74%)
W
Senegal (61%)
W
Iraq (60%)
D
Morocco (80%)
W
Sweden (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hungary A
1 - 2 L
72%
Germany A
0 - 4 L
87%
Cape Verde A
1 - 1 D
66%
New Zealand A
2 - 0 W
48%
Andorra H
4 - 0 W
46%
Malta H
0 - 1 L
52%
Netherlands A
0 - 4 L
79%
Lithuania H
2 - 1 W
46%
Poland A
1 - 3 L
74%
Norway A
0 - 1 L
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
England H
1 - 2 L
80%
Brazil A
2 - 1 W
80%
Ivory Coast A
2 - 1 W
78%
France H
1 - 4 L
74%
Senegal H
3 - 2 W
61%
Iraq A
4 - 1 W
60%
Morocco A
1 - 1 D
80%
Sweden H
3 - 1 W
56%
Switzerland H
0 - 0 D
66%
Netherlands A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Context matters here: Norway's schedule strength (SoS: 66.4) has been notably more demanding than Finland's (SoS: 55.2), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Norway leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Finland's 1.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Finland giving up 1.7 and Norway giving up 1.5 per fixture.

Finland has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Norway has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Norway is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Norway has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Norway faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Finland can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 20.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Norway. In practical terms, Norway would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Norway holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 59.8 against 39.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Internationals match (2025-09-04), Norway prevailed 1-0 against Finland. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Norway secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Finland will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Norway will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Finland

Finland

VS
Norway

Norway

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Finland

3W 1D 6L · 11 goals scored · 17 conceded

Norway

5W 2D 3L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or