Skip to content
Compare Fortuna vs Heracles

Fortuna vs Heracles Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fortuna vs Heracles: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fortuna Fortuna Home Team
Heracles Heracles Away Team
Fortuna
34.0
L L L W L L D L L W

Last 10 Matches

Heracles
24.6
L L L L L L D L D L

Performance Radar

Fortuna
Heracles

Categories Won

11

Fortuna

2

Draw

2

Heracles

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

0%

0W, 2D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.4

4 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-9

-9

-19

-19

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Sierhuis (2 goals)
T. van Gilst (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 1
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.1

League Difficulty: 73.0, Opponent Quality: 59.6

54.6

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 64.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.24

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.14

0.36

Actual: 0.4 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
34.0

Attack: 36.7, Defense: 33.4, Form: 20.0

24.6

Attack: 13.9, Defense: 24.4, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

3

46-60'

1

61-75'

76-90+'

1
Fortuna
Heracles
Fortuna

Power Rating Breakdown

34.0

Overall

Attack 36.7
Defense 33.4
Form 20.0
Consistency 57.7
Heracles

Power Rating Breakdown

24.6

Overall

Attack 13.9
Defense 24.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 95.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

73.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

59.6 vs 64.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Fortuna logo Fortuna
L
Metz (50%)
L
Olympiakos (41%)
L
Utrecht (71%)
W
Zwolle (48%)
L
Feyenoord (73%)
L
Heerenveen (68%)
D
NAC (50%)
L
AZ (71%)
Heracles logo Heracles
L
Groningen (53%)
L
Telstar (73%)
L
Zwolle (54%)
L
Volendam (57%)
L
Ajax (71%)
L
Heerenveen (68%)
D
Excelsior (64%)
L
AZ (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Metz A
1 - 3 L
50%
Olympiakos H
1 - 3 L
41%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
71%
Zwolle H
3 - 2 W
48%
Feyenoord H
1 - 2 L
73%
Heerenveen A
1 - 2 L
68%
NAC H
1 - 1 D
50%
AZ A
0 - 2 L
71%
Twente H
1 - 2 L
62%
Volendam A
2 - 1 W
62%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen H
1 - 2 L
53%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
73%
Zwolle A
0 - 1 L
54%
Volendam H
0 - 2 L
57%
Ajax H
0 - 3 L
71%
Heerenveen A
1 - 4 L
68%
Excelsior H
1 - 1 D
64%
AZ A
0 - 4 L
71%
Utrecht H
0 - 0 D
66%
PSV H
1 - 3 L
70%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 50.1 vs 54.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Fortuna leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Heracles's 0.4 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Fortuna conceding 2.0 and Heracles conceding 2.3 per match.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Heracles has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Fortuna is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Heracles is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Fortuna faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Heracles can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 74% win probability for Fortuna. In practical terms, Fortuna would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Fortuna has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.4-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fortuna

Fortuna

VS
Heracles

Heracles

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Fortuna

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 20 conceded

Heracles

0W 2D 8L · 4 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or