Skip to content
Compare Fredericia vs Randers

Fredericia vs Randers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Fredericia vs Randers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Fredericia Fredericia Home Team
Randers Randers Away Team
Fredericia
41.3
W W W L D L D D D L

Last 10 Matches

Randers
34.1
D D W L D W L D L L

Performance Radar

Fredericia
Randers

Categories Won

9

Fredericia

3

Draw

3

Randers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Lindekilde (4 goals)
C. Edudzi (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.6

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 49.7

39.6

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.82

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.12

1.21

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
41.3

Attack: 50.2, Defense: 38.4, Form: 26.6

34.1

Attack: 38.8, Defense: 29.9, Form: 17.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

1

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

Fredericia
Randers
Fredericia

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 50.2
Defense 38.4
Form 26.6
Consistency 57.7
Randers

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 38.8
Defense 29.9
Form 17.9
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

53.0 vs 53.0

Opponent Quality

49.7 vs 52.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Fredericia logo Fredericia
W
Esbjerg (43%)
W
Mafra (45%)
W
Silkeborg (50%)
L
Vejle (49%)
D
Copenhagen (74%)
L
OB (42%)
D
Randers (48%)
D
Silkeborg (55%)
Randers logo Randers
D
Silkeborg (50%)
D
Lechia (41%)
W
Notts Co (45%)
L
Copenhagen (79%)
D
OB (42%)
W
Vejle (44%)
L
Silkeborg (55%)
D
Fredericia (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Esbjerg A
1 - 0 W
43%
Mafra H
3 - 2 W
45%
Silkeborg H
4 - 1 W
50%
Vejle A
0 - 2 L
49%
Copenhagen H
3 - 3 D
74%
OB H
0 - 2 L
42%
Randers A
2 - 2 D
48%
Silkeborg A
2 - 2 D
55%
Vejle H
2 - 2 D
44%
OB A
0 - 1 L
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Silkeborg H
1 - 1 D
50%
Lechia A
2 - 2 D
41%
Notts Co H
3 - 1 W
45%
Copenhagen A
0 - 5 L
79%
OB H
2 - 2 D
42%
Vejle H
1 - 0 W
44%
Silkeborg A
0 - 2 L
55%
Fredericia H
2 - 2 D
50%
OB A
1 - 3 L
47%
Copenhagen H
1 - 2 L
74%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (38.6 vs 39.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Fredericia holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Randers's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Fredericia's backline outperforms Randers's, with 1.7 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Randers is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Fredericia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Randers can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Fredericia. In practical terms, Fredericia would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Fredericia, with a 7.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the Danish Superligaen (2026-04-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Fredericia

Fredericia

VS
Randers

Randers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Fredericia

3W 4D 3L · 17 goals scored · 17 conceded

Randers

2W 4D 4L · 13 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or