Skip to content
Compare GAIS vs Lens

GAIS vs Lens Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GAIS vs Lens: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GAIS GAIS Home Team
Lens Lens Away Team
GAIS
49.2
D W L W D W W D D L

Last 10 Matches

Lens
64.1
W W L W D D W W L W

Performance Radar

GAIS
Lens

Categories Won

2

GAIS

2

Draw

11

Lens

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 4D, 2L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Salter (3 goals)
F. Thauvin (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

83%

5W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.9

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

51.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 58.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

2.67

Actual: 2.4 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
49.2

Attack: 46.9, Defense: 64.5, Form: 35.2

64.1

Attack: 81.4, Defense: 54.2, Form: 61.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

5
4

76-90+'

4
GAIS
Lens
GAIS

Power Rating Breakdown

49.2

Overall

Attack 46.9
Defense 64.5
Form 35.2
Consistency 56.8
Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

64.1

Overall

Attack 81.4
Defense 54.2
Form 61.0
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 77.8

Opponent Quality

51.2 vs 58.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
GAIS logo GAIS
D
Brommapojkarna (54%)
W
Kalmar (46%)
L
Sirius (74%)
W
Hammarby (57%)
D
Degerfors (43%)
W
Västerås (49%)
W
Örgryte (28%)
D
IFK Göteborg (45%)
Lens logo Lens
W
Nice (47%)
W
Lyon (66%)
L
Paris SG (71%)
W
Nantes (53%)
D
Nice (68%)
D
Brest (53%)
W
Toulouse (43%)
W
Toulouse (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brommapojkarna A
1 - 1 D
54%
Kalmar H
3 - 0 W
46%
Sirius A
1 - 2 L
74%
Hammarby H
2 - 0 W
57%
Degerfors H
1 - 1 D
43%
Västerås A
1 - 0 W
49%
Örgryte H
4 - 0 W
28%
IFK Göteborg A
2 - 2 D
45%
Mjällby H
0 - 0 D
54%
Häcken A
1 - 2 L
62%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nice H
3 - 1 W
47%
Lyon A
4 - 0 W
66%
Paris SG H
0 - 2 L
71%
Nantes H
1 - 0 W
53%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
68%
Brest A
3 - 3 D
53%
Toulouse H
4 - 1 W
43%
Toulouse H
3 - 2 W
59%
Lille A
0 - 3 L
78%
Angers H
5 - 1 W
50%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Lens has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 51.7) compared to GAIS (SoS: 37.9). This means Lens's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.4 goals per match versus GAIS's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

GAIS has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Lens's 1.4.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 83% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lens has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GAIS

GAIS

VS
Lens

Lens

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

GAIS

4W 4D 2L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded

Lens

6W 2D 2L · 24 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or