Skip to content
Compare Gillingham vs Barrow

Gillingham vs Barrow Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gillingham vs Barrow: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gillingham Gillingham Home Team
Barrow Barrow Away Team
Gillingham
36.6
D L L W W L W W L L

Last 10 Matches

Barrow
37.2
D L L W W D W L L L

Performance Radar

Gillingham
Barrow

Categories Won

4

Gillingham

4

Draw

7

Barrow

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. McCleary (2 goals)
I. Cameron (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.9

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 48.2

43.7

League Difficulty: 40.5, Opponent Quality: 45.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.85

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.15

1.12

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
36.6

Attack: 32.0, Defense: 38.4, Form: 38.4

37.2

Attack: 37.5, Defense: 40.6, Form: 28.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

61-75'

2

76-90+'

3
Gillingham
Barrow
Gillingham

Power Rating Breakdown

36.6

Overall

Attack 32.0
Defense 38.4
Form 38.4
Consistency 39.7
Barrow

Power Rating Breakdown

37.2

Overall

Attack 37.5
Defense 40.6
Form 28.1
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.5 vs 40.5

Opponent Quality

48.2 vs 45.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gillingham logo Gillingham
D
Fleetwood (56%)
L
Walsall (36%)
L
Luton (59%)
W
Ebbsfleet (55%)
W
Millwall (47%)
L
Charlton (49%)
W
Dover (36%)
W
Shrewsbury (33%)
Barrow logo Barrow
D
Harrogate (62%)
L
Hornchurch (49%)
L
Hartlepool (46%)
W
Morecambe (30%)
W
Blackpool (52%)
D
Radcliffe (39%)
W
Mansfield (43%)
L
Newport (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fleetwood A
0 - 0 D
56%
Walsall H
0 - 3 L
36%
Luton H
0 - 3 L
59%
Ebbsfleet A
2 - 1 W
55%
Millwall H
1 - 0 W
47%
Charlton H
0 - 1 L
49%
Dover A
3 - 0 W
36%
Shrewsbury H
1 - 0 W
33%
Barnet A
2 - 6 L
60%
Grimsby H
1 - 4 L
51%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Harrogate A
2 - 2 D
62%
Hornchurch H
1 - 2 L
49%
Hartlepool A
0 - 2 L
46%
Morecambe A
1 - 0 W
30%
Blackpool H
2 - 0 W
52%
Radcliffe A
0 - 0 D
39%
Mansfield H
4 - 3 W
43%
Newport H
1 - 2 L
44%
Cambridge U A
0 - 3 L
57%
Walsall H
1 - 3 L
36%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.9 vs 43.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Gillingham (1.0 goals per match) and Barrow (1.2 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Gillingham giving up 1.8 and Barrow giving up 1.7 per fixture.

Gillingham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Barrow has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Gillingham's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gillingham

Gillingham

VS
Barrow

Barrow

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gillingham

4W 1D 5L · 10 goals scored · 18 conceded

Barrow

3W 2D 5L · 12 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or