Skip to content
Compare Gillingham vs Barrow

Gillingham vs Barrow Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gillingham vs Barrow: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gillingham Gillingham Home Team
Barrow Barrow Away Team
Gillingham
31.8
W L L L D W D L L L

Last 10 Matches

Barrow
29.8
L L L W L L D W L L

Performance Radar

Gillingham
Barrow

Categories Won

4

Gillingham

7

Draw

4

Barrow

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

-13

-13

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Hale (3 goals)
J. Gordon (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.1

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8

47.0

League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 51.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05

0.97

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
31.8

Attack: 31.4, Defense: 31.4, Form: 18.8

29.8

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 22.6, Form: 19.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

3

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

5
Gillingham
Barrow
Gillingham

Power Rating Breakdown

31.8

Overall

Attack 31.4
Defense 31.4
Form 18.8
Consistency 59.2
Barrow

Power Rating Breakdown

29.8

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 22.6
Form 19.4
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

40.0 vs 40.0

Opponent Quality

46.8 vs 51.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gillingham logo Gillingham
W
Shrewsbury (33%)
L
Barnet (65%)
L
Grimsby (51%)
L
Cheltenham (42%)
D
Salford (55%)
W
Accrington (27%)
D
Walsall (46%)
L
Crawley (47%)
Barrow logo Barrow
L
Newport (42%)
L
Cambridge Utd (54%)
L
Walsall (40%)
W
Oldham (44%)
L
Barnet (65%)
L
Chesterfield (56%)
D
MK Dons (56%)
W
Bromley (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shrewsbury H
1 - 0 W
33%
Barnet A
2 - 6 L
65%
Grimsby H
1 - 4 L
51%
Cheltenham A
1 - 2 L
42%
Salford A
0 - 0 D
55%
Accrington H
2 - 0 W
27%
Walsall A
2 - 2 D
46%
Crawley A
0 - 2 L
47%
Bristol Rovers H
1 - 2 L
62%
Swindon H
0 - 2 L
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
1 - 2 L
42%
Cambridge Utd A
0 - 3 L
54%
Walsall H
1 - 3 L
40%
Oldham H
3 - 2 W
44%
Barnet A
2 - 3 L
65%
Chesterfield H
0 - 1 L
56%
MK Dons A
0 - 0 D
56%
Bromley H
2 - 1 W
48%
Grimsby A
0 - 5 L
56%
Salford A
1 - 3 L
55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.1 vs 47.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Gillingham averaging 1.0 and Barrow averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Gillingham conceding 2.0 and Barrow conceding 2.3 per match.

Gillingham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Barrow has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gillingham

Gillingham

VS
Barrow

Barrow

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gillingham

2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 20 conceded

Barrow

2W 1D 7L · 10 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or