GKS Katowice vs Žilina Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare GKS Katowice vs Žilina: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
GKS Katowice
Home Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
GKS Katowice
Draw
Žilina
Statistical Comparison
3W, 6D, 1L
2W, 0D, 1L
18 / 10 matches
4 / 3 matches
13 / 10 matches
4 / 3 matches
+5
0
2 / 10 matches
0 / 3 matches
5 / 10 matches
2 / 3 matches
8 / 10 matches
2 / 3 matches
3W / 4 matches
2W / 2 matches
0W / 6 matches
0W / 1 matches
League Difficulty: 57.9, Opponent Quality: 56.5
League Difficulty: 82.7, Opponent Quality: 67.3
0W / 2 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.01
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.33
Attack: 55.7, Defense: 52.6, Form: 27.9
Attack: 46.2, Defense: 60.4, Form: 71.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
GKS Katowice
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Context matters here: Žilina's schedule strength (SoS: 56.6) has been notably more demanding than GKS Katowice's (SoS: 42.9), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
GKS Katowice leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Žilina's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Both defenses are comparable, with GKS Katowice conceding 1.3 and Žilina conceding 1.3 per match.
Žilina has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Žilina is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 3 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Žilina faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If GKS Katowice can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 7.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for Žilina. In practical terms, Žilina would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Žilina, with a 7.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-23), Žilina came out on top with a 2-1 victory over GKS Katowice. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Žilina secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. GKS Katowice will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Žilina will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
GKS Katowice
Žilina
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
GKS Katowice
3W 6D 1L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded
Žilina
2W 0D 1L · 4 goals scored · 4 conceded
Popular Teams