Glasgow City vs Queen's Park Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Glasgow City vs Queen's Park: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Glasgow City
Draw
Queen's Park
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
0W, 0D, 1L
17 / 10 matches
0 / 1 matches
11 / 10 matches
6 / 1 matches
+6
-6
4 / 10 matches
0 / 1 matches
5 / 10 matches
1 / 1 matches
4 / 10 matches
0 / 1 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 0 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 1 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 52.8
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.0
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.01
Actual: 0.0 | Diff: 0.0
Attack: 49.0, Defense: 54.8, Form: 25.9
Attack: 0.0, Defense: 0.0, Form: 0.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Queen's Park has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 48.0) compared to Glasgow City (SoS: 36.5). This means Queen's Park's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Glasgow City's attack is on another level, averaging 1.7 goals per match with L. Forrest leading the charge (4 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Defensively, Glasgow City is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Queen's Park leaks 6.0 goals per match.
Queen's Park has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 4.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Queen's Park is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 1 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Glasgow City is on the rise with 3W in last 10, while Queen's Park shows signs of decline with 0W in last 1.
💡 Why This Matters: The 36.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Glasgow City. In practical terms, Glasgow City would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Glasgow City is the clear and dominant favorite. With a power rating of 43.6 vs 7.5, and superior metrics across the board, Glasgow City should win this comfortably.
In the Scottish SWF Cup (2026-01-11), Glasgow City eliminated Queen's Park with a 6-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Glasgow City showed they can handle the pressure. Glasgow City secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-0 scoreline was emphatic — Glasgow City completely dominated Queen's Park in that encounter, raising serious questions about Queen's Park's ability to compete at this level. Queen's Park will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Glasgow City will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Glasgow City
Queen's Park
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Glasgow City
3W 2D 5L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded
Queen's Park
0W 0D 1L · 0 goals scored · 6 conceded
Popular Teams