Glenavon vs Bangor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Glenavon vs Bangor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Glenavon
Home Team
Bangor
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Glenavon
Draw
Bangor
Statistical Comparison
1W, 4D, 5L
4W, 2D, 4L
8 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-9
0
2 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
0W / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
3W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 42.9, Opponent Quality: 50.9
League Difficulty: 44.1, Opponent Quality: 44.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.1
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.28
Attack: 26.1, Defense: 42.3, Form: 9.8
Attack: 47.1, Defense: 47.1, Form: 37.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Glenavon
Bangor
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (47.7 vs 44.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Bangor leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.5 goals per game compared to Glenavon's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Glenavon giving up 1.7 and Bangor giving up 1.5 per fixture.
Glenavon has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Bangor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Glenavon is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Bangor is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Glenavon shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Bangor faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Glenavon can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Bangor. In practical terms, Bangor would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Bangor, with a 11.3-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the Irish Premiership (2026-04-11). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Glenavon
Bangor
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Glenavon
1W 4D 5L · 8 goals scored · 17 conceded
Bangor
4W 2D 4L · 15 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams