Skip to content
Compare Gnistan vs Lahti

Gnistan vs Lahti Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gnistan vs Lahti: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gnistan Gnistan Home Team
Lahti Lahti Away Team
Gnistan
53.3
W W D L W W W L D D

Last 10 Matches

Lahti
52.8
W L D W L W W W D D

Performance Radar

Gnistan
Lahti

Categories Won

8

Gnistan

3

Draw

4

Lahti

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Akinyemi (8 goals)
Neemias Barbosa (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.8

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.77

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.03

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
53.3

Attack: 57.7, Defense: 54.5, Form: 48.1

52.8

Attack: 35.1, Defense: 79.8, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

3
Gnistan
Lahti
Gnistan

Power Rating Breakdown

53.3

Overall

Attack 57.7
Defense 54.5
Form 48.1
Consistency 53.2
Lahti

Power Rating Breakdown

52.8

Overall

Attack 35.1
Defense 79.8
Form 47.9
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.8 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gnistan logo Gnistan
W
HJK (60%)
W
Ilves (44%)
D
SJK (44%)
L
KuPS (43%)
W
Inter Turku (58%)
W
Oulu (43%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
Lahti (59%)
Lahti logo Lahti
W
SJK (44%)
L
KuPS (43%)
D
Inter Turku (58%)
W
Jaro (33%)
L
Ilves (49%)
W
Mariehamn (34%)
W
HJK (55%)
W
Gnistan (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HJK A
3 - 2 W
60%
Ilves H
3 - 2 W
44%
SJK A
2 - 2 D
44%
KuPS H
0 - 1 L
43%
Inter Turku A
2 - 1 W
58%
Oulu A
2 - 0 W
43%
Mariehamn H
4 - 2 W
29%
Lahti A
0 - 1 L
59%
VPS H
1 - 1 D
50%
Jaro A
1 - 1 D
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK A
2 - 1 W
44%
KuPS H
1 - 2 L
43%
Inter Turku A
0 - 0 D
58%
Jaro H
2 - 0 W
33%
Ilves A
0 - 1 L
49%
Mariehamn A
2 - 0 W
34%
HJK H
2 - 0 W
55%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
54%
Oulu A
1 - 1 D
43%
TPS H
0 - 0 D
50%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.1 vs 45.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Gnistan holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Lahti's 1.1, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Lahti holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.5 goals per game and recording 6 clean sheets, compared to Gnistan's leaky backline that surrenders 1.3 goals per match.

Gnistan has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Lahti has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Gnistan has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Lahti has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Gnistan's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-04), Lahti prevailed 1-0 against Gnistan. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Lahti secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Gnistan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Lahti will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gnistan

Gnistan

VS
Lahti

Lahti

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gnistan

5W 3D 2L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded

Lahti

5W 3D 2L · 11 goals scored · 5 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or