Skip to content
Compare Go Ahead vs Excelsior

Go Ahead vs Excelsior Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Go Ahead vs Excelsior: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Go Ahead Go Ahead Home Team
Excelsior Excelsior Away Team
Go Ahead
50.9
W L L D D D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Excelsior
52.5
W W D W W D L D L L

Performance Radar

Go Ahead
Excelsior

Categories Won

5

Go Ahead

4

Draw

6

Excelsior

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Breum (4 goals)
D. Sanches Fernandes (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.3

League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 59.2

50.9

League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 58.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.02

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.02

2.44

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.44

Adjusted Power Rating
50.9

Attack: 67.5, Defense: 54.0, Form: 30.4

52.5

Attack: 67.3, Defense: 50.4, Form: 40.4

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

3
Go Ahead
Excelsior
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

50.9

Overall

Attack 67.5
Defense 54.0
Form 30.4
Consistency 53.2
Excelsior

Power Rating Breakdown

52.5

Overall

Attack 67.3
Defense 50.4
Form 40.4
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

76.5 vs 76.5

Opponent Quality

59.2 vs 58.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
W
OFI (39%)
L
NEC (78%)
L
PSV (70%)
D
Sparta (50%)
D
AZ (66%)
D
Groningen (58%)
W
Zwolle (48%)
L
Utrecht (71%)
Excelsior logo Excelsior
W
NAC (40%)
W
Sparta (50%)
D
Volendam (57%)
W
Groningen (58%)
W
Utrecht (66%)
D
Zwolle (54%)
L
NEC (73%)
D
Heracles (41%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OFI H
4 - 0 W
39%
NEC A
1 - 2 L
78%
PSV H
1 - 4 L
70%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
50%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
66%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
58%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
48%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
71%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
50%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
62%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
NAC A
3 - 1 W
40%
Sparta A
3 - 2 W
50%
Volendam H
1 - 1 D
57%
Groningen A
3 - 2 W
58%
Utrecht H
5 - 0 W
66%
Zwolle A
2 - 2 D
54%
NEC H
0 - 2 L
73%
Heracles A
1 - 1 D
41%
Feyenoord A
1 - 2 L
78%
Heerenveen H
1 - 2 L
63%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 51.3 vs 50.9), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Go Ahead averaging 2.0 and Excelsior averaging 2.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Go Ahead conceding 1.4 and Excelsior conceding 1.5 per match.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 3.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Excelsior has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Go Ahead's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Go Ahead

Go Ahead

VS
Excelsior

Excelsior

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Go Ahead

3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 14 conceded

Excelsior

4W 3D 3L · 20 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or