Górnik vs Piast Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Górnik vs Piast: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Górnik
Home Team
Piast
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Górnik
Draw
Piast
Statistical Comparison
6W, 2D, 2L
1W, 3D, 6L
16 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
+8
-7
4 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 61.0, Opponent Quality: 57.2
League Difficulty: 55.8, Opponent Quality: 51.3
1W / 2 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.06
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.08
Attack: 57.0, Defense: 78.4, Form: 64.1
Attack: 34.4, Defense: 44.7, Form: 10.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Górnik
Piast
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 56.9 vs 53.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Górnik leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Piast's 1.0 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Górnik holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.8 goals per game and recording 4 clean sheets, compared to Piast's leaky backline that surrenders 1.7 goals per match.
Piast has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Górnik has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
📈 Form Momentum: Górnik has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Piast is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Górnik is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Piast shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 27.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Górnik. In practical terms, Górnik would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Górnik emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (63.7 vs 35.8) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Górnik
Piast
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Górnik
6W 2D 2L · 16 goals scored · 8 conceded
Piast
1W 3D 6L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded
Popular Teams