Skip to content
Compare GAK vs Heidenheim

GAK vs Heidenheim Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare GAK vs Heidenheim: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

GAK GAK Home Team
Heidenheim Heidenheim Away Team
GAK
60.6
W D W L L D L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Heidenheim
48.5
L W D W L W D D L L

Performance Radar

GAK
Heidenheim

Categories Won

8

GAK

2

Draw

5

Heidenheim

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+11

+11

0

0

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Harakaté (4 goals)
B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.5

58.9

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 64.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.95

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.05

2.45

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.55

Adjusted Power Rating
60.6

Attack: 68.2, Defense: 71.6, Form: 51.2

48.5

Attack: 69.0, Defense: 39.9, Form: 32.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

4
6

76-90+'

5
GAK
Heidenheim
GAK

Power Rating Breakdown

60.6

Overall

Attack 68.2
Defense 71.6
Form 51.2
Consistency 45.7
Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

48.5

Overall

Attack 69.0
Defense 39.9
Form 32.7
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 91.0

Opponent Quality

50.5 vs 64.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
GAK logo GAK
W
BW Linz (57%)
D
Altach (49%)
W
WSG Tirol (38%)
L
WAC (57%)
L
Ried (54%)
D
Ried (49%)
L
Altach (54%)
W
BW Linz (52%)
Heidenheim logo Heidenheim
L
Mainz 05 (65%)
W
Köln (61%)
D
Bayern Munich (86%)
W
St. Pauli (45%)
L
Freiburg (66%)
W
Union Berlin (58%)
D
M'gladbach (70%)
D
Leverkusen (65%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
BW Linz A
3 - 0 W
57%
Altach H
2 - 2 D
49%
WSG Tirol H
4 - 0 W
38%
WAC A
0 - 1 L
57%
Ried A
1 - 2 L
54%
Ried H
1 - 1 D
49%
Altach A
0 - 1 L
54%
BW Linz H
2 - 1 W
52%
WSG Tirol A
5 - 1 W
43%
WAC H
2 - 0 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mainz 05 H
0 - 2 L
65%
Köln A
3 - 1 W
61%
Bayern Munich A
3 - 3 D
86%
St. Pauli H
2 - 0 W
45%
Freiburg A
1 - 2 L
66%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
58%
M'gladbach A
2 - 2 D
70%
Leverkusen H
3 - 3 D
65%
Frankfurt A
0 - 1 L
64%
Hoffenheim H
2 - 4 L
63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.3 vs 58.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with GAK averaging 2.0 and Heidenheim averaging 1.9 goals per match.

Defensively, GAK is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Heidenheim leaks 1.9 per match.

GAK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

GAK has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

GAK

GAK

VS
Heidenheim

Heidenheim

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

GAK

5W 2D 3L · 20 goals scored · 9 conceded

Heidenheim

3W 3D 4L · 19 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or