Grenada vs Rwanda Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Grenada vs Rwanda: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Grenada
Home Team
Rwanda
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Grenada
Draw
Rwanda
Statistical Comparison
6W, 0D, 4L
3W, 0D, 4L
21 / 10 matches
7 / 7 matches
17 / 10 matches
7 / 7 matches
+4
0
3 / 10 matches
3 / 7 matches
7 / 10 matches
2 / 7 matches
3 / 10 matches
0 / 7 matches
5W / 7 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 73.0, Opponent Quality: 57.5
League Difficulty: 68.6, Opponent Quality: 56.7
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.1
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.39
Attack: 69.5, Defense: 43.0, Form: 59.6
Attack: 32.4, Defense: 64.9, Form: 41.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Grenada
Rwanda
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.3 vs 47.3), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Few sides can match Grenada in front of goal. Their 2.1 average per fixture tells the story, with J. Francis driving that output personally responsible for 2 goals this campaign.
Rwanda's backline outperforms Grenada's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.7.
Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Grenada has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Grenada is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Rwanda shows signs of decline with 3W in last 7.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Grenada faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Rwanda can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Grenada. In practical terms, Grenada would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Grenada, with a 11.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
In their recent Internationals match (2026-03-27), Rwanda prevailed 4-0 against Grenada. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Rwanda secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Rwanda completely dominated Grenada in that encounter, raising serious questions about Grenada's ability to compete at this level. Grenada will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Rwanda will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Grenada
Rwanda
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Grenada
6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 17 conceded
Rwanda
3W 0D 4L · 7 goals scored · 7 conceded
Popular Teams