Skip to content
Compare Gretna vs Gala

Gretna vs Gala Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Gretna vs Gala: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Gretna Gretna Home Team
Gala Gala Away Team
Gretna
23.7
L D L L L L L W L D

Last 10 Matches

Gala
31.2
L L L L W W W L L L

Performance Radar

Gretna
Gala

Categories Won

3

Gretna

2

Draw

10

Gala

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

30%

3W, 0D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
3.6

36 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-24

-24

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
I. Anderson (5 goals)
L. Hall (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
33.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 39.6

32.5

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 36.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.0

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.2

1.19

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.41

Adjusted Power Rating
23.7

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 0.0, Form: 8.4

31.2

Attack: 44.0, Defense: 16.5, Form: 24.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Gretna
Gala
Gretna

Power Rating Breakdown

23.7

Overall

Attack 33.5
Defense 0.0
Form 8.4
Consistency 74.5
Gala

Power Rating Breakdown

31.2

Overall

Attack 44.0
Defense 16.5
Form 24.8
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 27.0

Opponent Quality

39.6 vs 36.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Gretna logo Gretna
L
Clydebank (63%)
D
Cumbernauld C. (38%)
L
Kilwinning (37%)
L
Troon (38%)
L
Gala (32%)
L
Berwick (35%)
L
Cumbernauld C. (43%)
W
Cowdenbeath (34%)
Gala logo Gala
L
Hill Of Beath (36%)
L
Rangers (48%)
L
Linlithgow (44%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (38%)
W
Gretna (17%)
W
Stirling Unv (17%)
W
Bo'ness Utd (38%)
L
Strollers (30%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clydebank A
1 - 7 L
63%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 3 D
38%
Kilwinning H
1 - 5 L
37%
Troon A
1 - 4 L
38%
Gala A
0 - 3 L
32%
Berwick H
2 - 7 L
35%
Cumbernauld C. A
1 - 3 L
43%
Cowdenbeath H
2 - 1 W
34%
Albion A
0 - 2 L
46%
East Stirling H
1 - 1 D
30%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hill Of Beath H
3 - 4 L
36%
Rangers H
0 - 4 L
48%
Linlithgow A
0 - 5 L
44%
Bo'ness Utd H
1 - 3 L
38%
Gretna H
3 - 0 W
17%
Stirling Unv A
2 - 0 W
17%
Bo'ness Utd H
3 - 1 W
38%
Strollers A
1 - 2 L
30%
Tranent A
1 - 2 L
55%
Cumbernauld C. H
2 - 3 L
38%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (33.8 vs 32.5), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Gala leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Gretna's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Gala is far superior, conceding just 2.4 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Gretna leaks 3.6 goals per match.

Gretna has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Gala has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Gretna is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Gala faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.4 goals per match. If Gretna can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 69% win probability for Gala. In practical terms, Gala would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Gala holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 7.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-04-18), Gala prevailed 3-0 against Gretna. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Gala secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Gala completely dominated Gretna in that encounter, raising serious questions about Gretna's ability to compete at this level. Gretna will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Gala will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Gretna

Gretna

VS
Gala

Gala

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Gretna

1W 2D 7L · 12 goals scored · 36 conceded

Gala

3W 0D 7L · 16 goals scored · 24 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or