Skip to content
Compare Halmstad vs Thun

Halmstad vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Halmstad vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Halmstad Halmstad Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Halmstad
30.5
L L W D L L L D D L

Last 10 Matches

Thun
35.7
D L L L L W L L W W

Performance Radar

Halmstad
Thun

Categories Won

2

Halmstad

3

Draw

10

Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Faraj (3 goals)
E. Rastoder (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 48.0

38.6

League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.94

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.04

1.48

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
30.5

Attack: 29.6, Defense: 29.6, Form: 9.9

35.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 26.6, Form: 26.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

3
Halmstad
Thun
Halmstad

Power Rating Breakdown

30.5

Overall

Attack 29.6
Defense 29.6
Form 9.9
Consistency 74.8
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 47.3
Defense 26.6
Form 26.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 51.0

Opponent Quality

48.0 vs 52.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Halmstad logo Halmstad
L
Västerås (44%)
L
Malmö (53%)
W
Örgryte (28%)
D
Elfsborg (51%)
L
Kalmar (51%)
L
Brommapojkarna (49%)
L
Mjällby (59%)
D
Hammarby (62%)
Thun logo Thun
D
St.Gallen (64%)
L
Young Boys (53%)
L
Sion (73%)
L
Basel (44%)
L
Lugano (58%)
W
Basel (39%)
L
Lugano (58%)
L
Zürich (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Västerås H
1 - 3 L
44%
Malmö A
2 - 5 L
53%
Örgryte H
2 - 0 W
28%
Elfsborg H
1 - 1 D
51%
Kalmar A
0 - 2 L
51%
Brommapojkarna H
1 - 3 L
49%
Mjällby A
0 - 2 L
59%
Hammarby A
1 - 1 D
62%
IFK Göteborg H
1 - 1 D
40%
Degerfors H
0 - 3 L
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
St.Gallen A
1 - 1 D
64%
Young Boys H
3 - 8 L
53%
Sion A
0 - 2 L
73%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
44%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
58%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
39%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
58%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
40%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Halmstad has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 48.8) compared to Thun (SoS: 38.6). This means Halmstad's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Halmstad's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Halmstad conceding 2.1 and Thun conceding 2.1 per match.

Halmstad has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Thun has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Halmstad

Halmstad

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Halmstad

1W 3D 6L · 9 goals scored · 21 conceded

Thun

3W 1D 6L · 16 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or