Hamburger vs Heidenheim Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Hamburger vs Heidenheim: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Hamburger
Home Team
Heidenheim
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Hamburger
Draw
Heidenheim
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
4W, 3D, 3L
16 / 10 matches
25 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-5
+10
0 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 81.8, Opponent Quality: 65.7
League Difficulty: 77.2, Opponent Quality: 59.6
1W / 4 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.37
Actual: 2.5 | Diff: -0.35
Attack: 59.7, Defense: 33.6, Form: 33.6
Attack: 84.8, Defense: 50.8, Form: 40.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Hamburger
Heidenheim
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Hamburger has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 62.0) compared to Heidenheim (SoS: 51.7). This means Hamburger's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Heidenheim leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.5 goals per game compared to Hamburger's 1.6 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Heidenheim has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Hamburger's 2.1.
Hamburger has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Heidenheim has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Heidenheim faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Hamburger can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 14.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Heidenheim. In practical terms, Heidenheim would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Heidenheim, with a 14.1-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-25), Hamburger prevailed 3-1 against Heidenheim. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Hamburger secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Heidenheim will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Hamburger will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Hamburger
Heidenheim
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Hamburger
3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 21 conceded
Heidenheim
4W 3D 3L · 25 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams