HamKam vs Aalesund Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare HamKam vs Aalesund: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
HamKam
Home Team
Aalesund
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
HamKam
Draw
Aalesund
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
2W, 6D, 2L
12 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
27 / 10 matches
-6
-7
2 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 7 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.2
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.22
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.22
Attack: 35.5, Defense: 35.5, Form: 17.8
Attack: 67.5, Defense: 10.1, Form: 20.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
HamKam
Aalesund
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Aalesund has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 51.3 against considerably stronger competition than HamKam (SoS: 38.8). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Offensively, Aalesund outperforms HamKam with 2.0 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Defensively, HamKam is far superior, conceding just 1.8 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Aalesund leaks 2.7 goals per match.
Aalesund has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: HamKam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Aalesund is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Aalesund faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.7 goals per match. If HamKam can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Aalesund. In practical terms, Aalesund would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
Aalesund has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Norwegian Eliteserien (2026-08-09). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 2-2 in the Norwegian Eliteserien (2026-05-29). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
HamKam
Aalesund
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
HamKam
2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded
Aalesund
2W 6D 2L · 20 goals scored · 27 conceded
Popular Teams