Skip to content
Compare Hammarby vs AZ

Hammarby vs AZ Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hammarby vs AZ: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hammarby Hammarby Home Team
AZ AZ Away Team
Hammarby
59.2
W L L L W W W D D W

Last 10 Matches

AZ
52.3
D D D D D W L W L W

Performance Radar

Hammarby
AZ

Categories Won

9

Hammarby

2

Draw

4

AZ

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+11

+11

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
V. Lind (5 goals)
S. Mijnans (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.7

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 47.8

59.0

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.02

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.28

1.94

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
59.2

Attack: 75.7, Defense: 59.2, Form: 49.4

52.3

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 58.1, Form: 32.7

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

9
3

16-30'

3

31-45'

4

46-60'

1
6

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

3
Hammarby
AZ
Hammarby

Power Rating Breakdown

59.2

Overall

Attack 75.7
Defense 59.2
Form 49.4
Consistency 45.7
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

52.3

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 58.1
Form 32.7
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 79.4

Opponent Quality

47.8 vs 65.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 17%
Hammarby logo Hammarby
W
Elfsborg (56%)
L
Häcken (62%)
L
AIK (44%)
L
GAIS (60%)
W
Malmö (48%)
W
IFK Göteborg (45%)
W
Västerås (44%)
D
Djurgården (58%)
AZ logo AZ
D
NAC (47%)
D
Feyenoord (72%)
D
Twente (70%)
D
Go Ahead (64%)
D
Shakhtar D (70%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Shakhtar D (75%)
W
Fortuna (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Elfsborg A
2 - 1 W
56%
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
62%
AIK H
1 - 2 L
44%
GAIS A
0 - 2 L
60%
Malmö H
4 - 1 W
48%
IFK Göteborg A
1 - 0 W
45%
Västerås H
3 - 0 W
44%
Djurgården A
1 - 1 D
58%
Halmstad H
1 - 1 D
33%
Örgryte H
8 - 1 W
28%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
NAC H
3 - 3 D
47%
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
72%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
70%
Go Ahead A
0 - 0 D
64%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
70%
Heerenveen H
3 - 0 W
65%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
75%
Fortuna H
2 - 0 W
51%
Groningen A
0 - 3 L
70%
Sparta Prague A
4 - 0 W
73%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

AZ has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.0) compared to Hammarby (SoS: 48.7). This means AZ's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Hammarby holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus AZ's 1.7, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Hammarby conceding 1.2 and AZ conceding 1.4 per match.

Hammarby has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Hammarby has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hammarby

Hammarby

VS
AZ

AZ

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hammarby

5W 2D 3L · 23 goals scored · 12 conceded

AZ

3W 5D 2L · 17 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or