Hartberg vs Dender Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Hartberg vs Dender: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Hartberg
Home Team
Dender
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Hartberg
Draw
Dender
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
2W, 1D, 7L
11 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
-5
-9
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.1
League Difficulty: 56.6, Opponent Quality: 52.6
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.04
Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 18.1
Attack: 30.3, Defense: 33.4, Form: 18.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Hartberg
Dender
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.6 vs 41.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Hartberg averaging 1.1 and Dender averaging 1.0 goals per match.
Both defenses are comparable, with Hartberg conceding 1.6 and Dender conceding 1.9 per match.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Hartberg
Dender
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Hartberg
2W 3D 5L · 11 goals scored · 16 conceded
Dender
2W 1D 7L · 10 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams