Skip to content
Compare Hartberg vs Nieciecza

Hartberg vs Nieciecza Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs Nieciecza: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Hartberg Home Team
Nieciecza Nieciecza Away Team
Hartberg
35.2
W L L L W D D L L D

Last 10 Matches

Nieciecza
35.2
W W L L W L L W L L

Performance Radar

Hartberg
Nieciecza

Categories Won

3

Hartberg

4

Draw

8

Nieciecza

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Havel (3 goals)
K. Zapolnik (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.1

41.0

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 52.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

1.44

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
35.2

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 18.1

35.2

Attack: 45.5, Defense: 21.2, Form: 36.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

3
Hartberg
Nieciecza
Hartberg

Power Rating Breakdown

35.2

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 42.3
Form 18.1
Consistency 61.3
Nieciecza

Power Rating Breakdown

35.2

Overall

Attack 45.5
Defense 21.2
Form 36.4
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

53.1 vs 52.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hartberg logo Hartberg
W
RB Salzburg (51%)
L
Sturm (62%)
L
Austria (47%)
L
LASK (64%)
W
Rapid Vienna (44%)
D
Rapid Vienna (39%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
Nieciecza logo Nieciecza
W
Lechia (38%)
W
Arka (43%)
L
Legia (62%)
L
GKS Katowice (59%)
W
Zagłębie (44%)
L
Wisła Płock (46%)
L
Widzew (59%)
W
Piast (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
RB Salzburg A
3 - 1 W
51%
Sturm H
2 - 4 L
62%
Austria A
0 - 1 L
47%
LASK H
1 - 5 L
64%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
44%
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
39%
Sturm A
0 - 0 D
66%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 2 L
46%
Austria H
0 - 1 L
42%
LASK A
0 - 0 D
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lechia H
3 - 2 W
38%
Arka A
3 - 2 W
43%
Legia H
0 - 1 L
62%
GKS Katowice A
1 - 5 L
59%
Zagłębie A
2 - 1 W
44%
Wisła Płock H
1 - 3 L
46%
Widzew A
0 - 1 L
59%
Piast H
3 - 2 W
49%
Lech A
1 - 4 L
72%
Motor H
1 - 2 L
48%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.6 vs 41.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Nieciecza holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Hartberg's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Hartberg has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Nieciecza's 2.3.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Hartberg

VS
Nieciecza

Nieciecza

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hartberg

2W 3D 5L · 11 goals scored · 16 conceded

Nieciecza

4W 0D 6L · 15 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or