Skip to content
Compare Hartberg vs ZW

Hartberg vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hartberg vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hartberg Hartberg Home Team
ZW ZW Away Team
Hartberg
35.2
W L L L W D D L L D

Last 10 Matches

ZW
59.7
W W W W W D W L L L

Performance Radar

Hartberg
ZW

Categories Won

0

Hartberg

4

Draw

11

ZW

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Havel (3 goals)
J. Opoku (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.1

54.6

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
35.2

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 18.1

59.7

Attack: 59.3, Defense: 66.2, Form: 62.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

4

61-75'

5
2

76-90+'

3
Hartberg
ZW
Hartberg

Power Rating Breakdown

35.2

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 42.3
Form 18.1
Consistency 61.3
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 59.3
Defense 66.2
Form 62.8
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

53.1 vs 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hartberg logo Hartberg
W
RB Salzburg (51%)
L
Sturm (62%)
L
Austria (47%)
L
LASK (64%)
W
Rapid Vienna (44%)
D
Rapid Vienna (39%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (32%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (49%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (63%)
L
Gent (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
RB Salzburg A
3 - 1 W
51%
Sturm H
2 - 4 L
62%
Austria A
0 - 1 L
47%
LASK H
1 - 5 L
64%
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
44%
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
39%
Sturm A
0 - 0 D
66%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 2 L
46%
Austria H
0 - 1 L
42%
LASK A
0 - 0 D
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
32%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
49%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
63%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
64%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

ZW has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 54.6) compared to Hartberg (SoS: 40.6). This means ZW's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

ZW holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Hartberg's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

ZW has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Hartberg's 1.6.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

ZW emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (59.7 vs 35.2) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hartberg

Hartberg

VS
ZW

ZW

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hartberg

2W 3D 5L · 11 goals scored · 16 conceded

ZW

6W 1D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or