Skip to content
Compare Hearts vs Bo'ness Utd

Hearts vs Bo'ness Utd Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hearts vs Bo'ness Utd: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hearts Hearts Home Team
Bo'ness Utd Bo'ness Utd Away Team
Hearts
26.2
W L W L L L D L L W

Last 10 Matches

Bo'ness Utd
38.7
D W W L W L D D L D

Performance Radar

Hearts
Bo'ness Utd

Categories Won

3

Hearts

4

Draw

8

Bo'ness Utd

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.8

28 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

0

0

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Wilson (2 goals)
K. Mitchell (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.0

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 40.4

31.5

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 35.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.1

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.1

1.38

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.32

Adjusted Power Rating
26.2

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 5.7, Form: 25.5

38.7

Attack: 46.2, Defense: 35.3, Form: 24.4

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

3
5

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

4
Hearts
Bo'ness Utd
Hearts

Power Rating Breakdown

26.2

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 5.7
Form 25.5
Consistency 46.0
Bo'ness Utd

Power Rating Breakdown

38.7

Overall

Attack 46.2
Defense 35.3
Form 24.4
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

27.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

40.4 vs 35.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hearts logo Hearts
W
Berwick (48%)
L
Cowdenbeath (39%)
W
Albion (41%)
L
East Stirling (35%)
L
Clydebank (58%)
L
Bonnyrigg RA (52%)
D
Gretna (17%)
L
Cumbernauld C. (43%)
Bo'ness Utd logo Bo'ness Utd
D
Musselburgh (30%)
W
Strollers (25%)
W
Gala (32%)
L
Berwick (40%)
W
Cumbernauld C. (38%)
L
Gala (32%)
D
Tranent (55%)
D
Cowdenbeath (34%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Berwick A
4 - 3 W
48%
Cowdenbeath A
0 - 3 L
39%
Albion H
3 - 0 W
41%
East Stirling A
2 - 4 L
35%
Clydebank H
0 - 8 L
58%
Bonnyrigg RA A
0 - 4 L
52%
Gretna H
1 - 1 D
17%
Cumbernauld C. A
0 - 3 L
43%
Broxburn Ath. H
0 - 1 L
33%
Bo'ness Utd H
2 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Musselburgh A
2 - 2 D
30%
Strollers H
2 - 0 W
25%
Gala A
3 - 1 W
32%
Berwick A
2 - 4 L
40%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 2 W
38%
Gala A
1 - 3 L
32%
Tranent A
1 - 1 D
55%
Cowdenbeath H
1 - 1 D
34%
Strollers A
0 - 1 L
30%
Celtic H
2 - 2 D
43%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 35.0 vs 31.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Bo'ness Utd leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Hearts's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Bo'ness Utd holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.7 goals per game and recording 1 clean sheets, compared to Hearts's leaky backline that surrenders 2.8 goals per match.

Hearts has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bo'ness Utd has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Bo'ness Utd faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Hearts can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 81% win probability for Bo'ness Utd. In practical terms, Bo'ness Utd would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Bo'ness Utd, with a 12.5-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-02-13), Hearts prevailed 2-1 against Bo'ness Utd. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Hearts secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Bo'ness Utd will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Hearts will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hearts

Hearts

VS
Bo'ness Utd

Bo'ness Utd

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hearts

3W 1D 6L · 12 goals scored · 28 conceded

Bo'ness Utd

3W 4D 3L · 17 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or