Hearts vs Falkirk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Hearts vs Falkirk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Hearts
Home Team
Falkirk
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Hearts
Draw
Falkirk
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
3W, 2D, 5L
18 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-2
-2
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 6 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 71.7, Opponent Quality: 69.0
League Difficulty: 57.5, Opponent Quality: 55.1
0W / 6 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.35
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.09
Attack: 61.7, Defense: 34.3, Form: 41.1
Attack: 46.0, Defense: 53.0, Form: 31.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Hearts
Falkirk
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.8 vs 56.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Hearts outperforms Falkirk with 1.8 goals per match to 1.3, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Falkirk's backline outperforms Hearts's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.
Hearts has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Falkirk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Falkirk's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.
In their recent Scottish Premiership match (2026-05-13), Hearts prevailed 3-0 against Falkirk. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Hearts secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Hearts completely dominated Falkirk in that encounter, raising serious questions about Falkirk's ability to compete at this level. Falkirk will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Hearts will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Hearts
Falkirk
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Hearts
4W 2D 4L · 18 goals scored · 20 conceded
Falkirk
3W 2D 5L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams