Heidenheim vs Standard Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Heidenheim vs Standard: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Heidenheim
Home Team
Standard
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Heidenheim
Draw
Standard
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
5W, 2D, 3L
19 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
0
+6
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
4W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 64.3
League Difficulty: 50.8, Opponent Quality: 48.8
0W / 2 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.55
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.17
Attack: 69.0, Defense: 39.9, Form: 32.7
Attack: 56.4, Defense: 63.1, Form: 49.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Heidenheim
Standard
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 58.9 vs 49.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Heidenheim averaging 1.9 and Standard averaging 1.7 goals per match.
Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.
Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Standard is a strong road team with a 80% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.
Standard has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Heidenheim
Standard
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Heidenheim
3W 3D 4L · 19 goals scored · 19 conceded
Standard
5W 2D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams