Skip to content
Compare Hemel H vs Horsham

Hemel H vs Horsham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hemel H vs Horsham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hemel H Hemel H Home Team
Horsham Horsham Away Team
Hemel H
40.4
L D D W W D L D L W

Last 10 Matches

Horsham
36.7
L W W L L D L W L L

Performance Radar

Hemel H
Horsham

Categories Won

8

Hemel H

4

Draw

3

Horsham

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Campbell (4 goals)
L. Gravata (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
36.6

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 40.0

39.8

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 44.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.85

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.25

0.92

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 31.8, Defense: 57.7, Form: 26.0

36.7

Attack: 29.9, Defense: 50.9, Form: 26.9

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
Hemel H
Horsham
Hemel H

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 31.8
Defense 57.7
Form 26.0
Consistency 57.7
Horsham

Power Rating Breakdown

36.7

Overall

Attack 29.9
Defense 50.9
Form 26.9
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

40.0 vs 44.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Hemel H logo Hemel H
L
Wealdstone (48%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (36%)
D
Salisbury (41%)
W
Torquay (53%)
W
Eastbourne (24%)
D
Enfield T (38%)
L
Chesham (43%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
Horsham logo Horsham
L
Sutton (41%)
W
Eastbourne T. (42%)
W
Chippenham (38%)
L
Salisbury (46%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Maidstone (57%)
L
Farnborough (48%)
W
Dorking (34%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wealdstone A
0 - 1 L
48%
Weston-s-Mare H
1 - 1 D
36%
Salisbury H
1 - 1 D
41%
Torquay A
2 - 1 W
53%
Eastbourne H
3 - 1 W
24%
Enfield T A
0 - 0 D
38%
Chesham H
0 - 3 L
43%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 0 D
40%
Dorking A
1 - 2 L
39%
Bath A
3 - 0 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sutton A
0 - 2 L
41%
Eastbourne T. H
3 - 0 W
42%
Chippenham H
3 - 2 W
38%
Salisbury A
1 - 2 L
46%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Maidstone H
0 - 0 D
57%
Farnborough A
0 - 2 L
48%
Dorking H
3 - 0 W
34%
Torquay A
0 - 2 L
53%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 2 L
44%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 36.6 vs 39.8), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Hemel H (1.1 goals per match) and Horsham (1.0 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Hemel H's backline outperforms Horsham's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.3.

Hemel H has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Horsham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Horsham has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.2 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

💡 Why This Matters: Horsham's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hemel H

Hemel H

VS
Horsham

Horsham

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hemel H

3W 4D 3L · 11 goals scored · 10 conceded

Horsham

3W 1D 6L · 10 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or