Skip to content
Compare HJK vs TPS

HJK vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare HJK vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

HJK HJK Home Team
TPS TPS Away Team
HJK
61.8
L W L W D L W W W W

Last 10 Matches

TPS
48.6
D W D W L L W L W D

Performance Radar

HJK
TPS

Categories Won

11

HJK

2

Draw

2

TPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Pukki (4 goals)
A. Muzaci (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.0

League Difficulty: 58.2, Opponent Quality: 55.0

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.85

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.05

1.33

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
61.8

Attack: 63.0, Defense: 70.0, Form: 63.0

48.6

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

2

76-90+'

3
HJK
TPS
HJK

Power Rating Breakdown

61.8

Overall

Attack 63.0
Defense 70.0
Form 63.0
Consistency 43.3
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 60.7
Form 38.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.2 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

55.0 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
HJK logo HJK
L
Gnistan (54%)
W
Jaro (33%)
L
Motherwell (70%)
W
Oulu (43%)
D
Motherwell (65%)
L
SJK (44%)
W
Coleraine (73%)
W
TPS (50%)
TPS logo TPS
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
VPS (55%)
D
KuPS (48%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
Ilves (44%)
W
Oulu (38%)
L
SJK (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gnistan H
2 - 3 L
54%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
33%
Motherwell A
0 - 2 L
70%
Oulu A
1 - 0 W
43%
Motherwell H
1 - 1 D
65%
SJK A
0 - 3 L
44%
Coleraine A
3 - 0 W
73%
TPS H
1 - 0 W
50%
Coleraine H
5 - 0 W
68%
VPS H
2 - 1 W
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
VPS A
3 - 1 W
55%
KuPS A
1 - 1 D
48%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
29%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
60%
Ilves H
1 - 3 L
44%
Oulu H
3 - 0 W
38%
SJK A
1 - 3 L
44%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
33%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
59%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.0 vs 45.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

HJK holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus TPS's 1.5, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, HJK and TPS are evenly matched, allowing 1.0 and 1.1 goals per game respectively.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

📈 Form Momentum: HJK has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 13.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 83% win probability for HJK. In practical terms, HJK would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

HJK has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.2-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-26), HJK prevailed 1-0 against TPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. HJK secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. TPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. HJK will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

HJK

HJK

VS
TPS

TPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

HJK

6W 1D 3L · 18 goals scored · 10 conceded

TPS

4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or