Skip to content
Compare HJK vs VPS

HJK vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare HJK vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

HJK HJK Home Team
VPS VPS Away Team
HJK
48.2
L W D W W L D L W D

Last 10 Matches

VPS
58.4
W D W W D L W D D W

Performance Radar

HJK
VPS

Categories Won

2

HJK

4

Draw

9

VPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

50%

5W, 4D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Borchers (6 goals)
L. Smyth (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.0

45.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.61

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.19

1.76

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
48.2

Attack: 57.4, Defense: 47.8, Form: 38.2

58.4

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 70.3, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

6
2

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

3
5

76-90+'

4
HJK
VPS
HJK

Power Rating Breakdown

48.2

Overall

Attack 57.4
Defense 47.8
Form 38.2
Consistency 50.5
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

58.4

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 70.3
Form 47.9
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.0 vs 46.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
HJK logo HJK
L
KuPS (62%)
W
Mariehamn (27%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Jaro (34%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
VPS (63%)
D
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
VPS logo VPS
W
Mariehamn (22%)
D
Gnistan (60%)
W
Oulu (49%)
W
SJK (46%)
D
KuPS (62%)
L
TPS (46%)
W
HJK (49%)
D
Lahti (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
KuPS H
0 - 4 L
62%
Mariehamn A
4 - 0 W
27%
Inter Turku H
3 - 3 D
56%
Jaro A
5 - 2 W
34%
Mariehamn H
1 - 0 W
22%
VPS A
1 - 2 L
63%
Ilves H
2 - 2 D
46%
TPS A
0 - 1 L
46%
Lahti H
1 - 0 W
43%
Inter Turku A
1 - 1 D
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
22%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
60%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
49%
SJK A
2 - 1 W
46%
KuPS H
1 - 1 D
62%
TPS A
0 - 1 L
46%
HJK H
2 - 1 W
49%
Lahti A
1 - 1 D
48%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Mariehamn A
1 - 0 W
27%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.6 vs 45.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with HJK averaging 1.8 and VPS averaging 1.8 goals per match.

VPS has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to HJK's 1.5.

HJK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

VPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-05-22), VPS prevailed 2-1 against HJK. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. VPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. HJK will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. VPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

HJK

HJK

VS
VPS

VPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

HJK

4W 3D 3L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

VPS

5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or