Skip to content
Compare Huddersfield vs Port Vale

Huddersfield vs Port Vale Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Huddersfield vs Port Vale: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Huddersfield Huddersfield Home Team
Port Vale Port Vale Away Team
Huddersfield
49.1
W L L W W L D D D W

Last 10 Matches

Port Vale
55.0
W W W L W L L D W D

Performance Radar

Huddersfield
Port Vale

Categories Won

5

Huddersfield

2

Draw

8

Port Vale

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Harness (4 goals)
E. Archer (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 18
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

49.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.82

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.28

1.57

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
49.1

Attack: 68.9, Defense: 36.1, Form: 39.4

55.0

Attack: 49.8, Defense: 73.0, Form: 49.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

5

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

2

76-90+'

Huddersfield
Port Vale
Huddersfield

Power Rating Breakdown

49.1

Overall

Attack 68.9
Defense 36.1
Form 39.4
Consistency 50.5
Port Vale

Power Rating Breakdown

55.0

Overall

Attack 49.8
Defense 73.0
Form 49.8
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

50.6 vs 52.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Huddersfield logo Huddersfield
W
Oldham (35%)
L
Fleetwood (55%)
L
Sheff Utd (58%)
W
Fylde (58%)
W
Wimbledon (41%)
L
Mansfield (52%)
D
Bolton (60%)
D
Cardiff (63%)
Port Vale logo Port Vale
W
Murcia (40%)
W
Wigan (52%)
W
Tamworth (48%)
L
Lincoln (61%)
W
Stockport (59%)
L
Plymouth (67%)
L
Cardiff (68%)
D
Wigan (47%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oldham H
3 - 1 W
35%
Fleetwood A
1 - 2 L
55%
Sheff Utd A
1 - 3 L
58%
Fylde A
2 - 1 W
58%
Wimbledon A
4 - 0 W
41%
Mansfield H
1 - 4 L
52%
Bolton A
3 - 3 D
60%
Cardiff H
1 - 1 D
63%
Wycombe H
3 - 3 D
44%
L Orient A
2 - 1 W
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Murcia H
1 - 0 W
40%
Wigan A
3 - 1 W
52%
Tamworth H
5 - 0 W
48%
Lincoln H
0 - 2 L
61%
Stockport A
2 - 1 W
59%
Plymouth A
1 - 2 L
67%
Cardiff A
0 - 1 L
68%
Wigan H
0 - 0 D
47%
Peterborough A
3 - 1 W
42%
Barnsley H
0 - 0 D
43%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.4 vs 49.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Huddersfield leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.1 goals per game compared to Port Vale's 1.5 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Port Vale holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.8 goals per game and recording 4 clean sheets, compared to Huddersfield's leaky backline that surrenders 1.9 goals per match.

Huddersfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Port Vale has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Port Vale is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Huddersfield has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Port Vale has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Port Vale. In practical terms, Port Vale would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

Port Vale has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.9-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Huddersfield

Huddersfield

VS
Port Vale

Port Vale

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Huddersfield

4W 3D 3L · 21 goals scored · 19 conceded

Port Vale

5W 2D 3L · 15 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or