Skip to content
Compare Ilves vs Jaro

Ilves vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ilves vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ilves Ilves Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
Ilves
45.2
L D L W W L W L D W

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
27.8
W L D L L L W L L L

Performance Radar

Ilves
Jaro

Categories Won

9

Ilves

4

Draw

2

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Kanga (7 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.2

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.0

48.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.57

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23

1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
45.2

Attack: 57.7, Defense: 38.5, Form: 38.5

27.8

Attack: 36.1, Defense: 9.8, Form: 19.7

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

4
1

31-45'

2
5

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

4

76-90+'

1
Ilves
Jaro
Ilves

Power Rating Breakdown

45.2

Overall

Attack 57.7
Defense 38.5
Form 38.5
Consistency 44.8
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.8

Overall

Attack 36.1
Defense 9.8
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

47.0 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Ilves logo Ilves
L
Jaro (34%)
D
SJK (41%)
L
KuPS (62%)
W
Jaro (29%)
W
TPS (41%)
L
Lahti (48%)
W
Gnistan (56%)
L
Inter Turku (56%)
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Jaro A
1 - 2 L
34%
SJK H
2 - 2 D
41%
KuPS A
3 - 4 L
62%
Jaro H
5 - 0 W
29%
TPS H
1 - 0 W
41%
Lahti A
0 - 5 L
48%
Gnistan H
2 - 0 W
56%
Inter Turku H
1 - 3 L
56%
HJK A
2 - 2 D
54%
Oulu H
1 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
62%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 46.2 vs 48.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Ilves holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Jaro's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Ilves is far superior, conceding just 1.8 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.7 per match.

Ilves has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Ilves emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (45.2 vs 27.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-04), Jaro prevailed 2-1 against Ilves. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Jaro secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Ilves will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Jaro will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-06-17), Ilves prevailed 5-0 against Jaro. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Ilves secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 5-0 scoreline was emphatic — Ilves completely dominated Jaro in that encounter, raising serious questions about Jaro's ability to compete at this level. Jaro will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ilves will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ilves

Ilves

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Ilves

4W 2D 4L · 18 goals scored · 18 conceded

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or