Skip to content
Compare Ilves vs Lahti

Ilves vs Lahti Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ilves vs Lahti: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ilves Ilves Home Team
Lahti Lahti Away Team
Ilves
45.6
L L D W L L W W L W

Last 10 Matches

Lahti
52.8
W L D W L W W W D D

Performance Radar

Ilves
Lahti

Categories Won

5

Ilves

3

Draw

7

Lahti

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.5

5 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Hytönen (4 goals)
Neemias Barbosa (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.9

League Difficulty: 58.2, Opponent Quality: 58.1

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.88

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.22

1.05

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
45.6

Attack: 36.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 40.0

52.8

Attack: 35.1, Defense: 79.8, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

3
Ilves
Lahti
Ilves

Power Rating Breakdown

45.6

Overall

Attack 36.6
Defense 66.6
Form 40.0
Consistency 39.7
Lahti

Power Rating Breakdown

52.8

Overall

Attack 35.1
Defense 79.8
Form 47.9
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.2 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

58.1 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Ilves logo Ilves
L
VPS (50%)
L
Gnistan (58%)
D
Rijeka (70%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
Rijeka (75%)
L
Oulu (43%)
W
Stjarnan (73%)
W
Lahti (54%)
Lahti logo Lahti
W
SJK (44%)
L
KuPS (43%)
D
Inter Turku (58%)
W
Jaro (33%)
L
Ilves (49%)
W
Mariehamn (34%)
W
HJK (55%)
W
Gnistan (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
VPS H
0 - 1 L
50%
Gnistan A
2 - 3 L
58%
Rijeka H
1 - 1 D
70%
Mariehamn H
2 - 0 W
29%
Rijeka A
0 - 1 L
75%
Oulu A
0 - 1 L
43%
Stjarnan H
2 - 1 W
73%
Lahti H
1 - 0 W
54%
Stjarnan A
0 - 1 L
75%
TPS A
3 - 1 W
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SJK A
2 - 1 W
44%
KuPS H
1 - 2 L
43%
Inter Turku A
0 - 0 D
58%
Jaro H
2 - 0 W
33%
Ilves A
0 - 1 L
49%
Mariehamn A
2 - 0 W
34%
HJK H
2 - 0 W
55%
Gnistan H
1 - 0 W
54%
Oulu A
1 - 1 D
43%
TPS H
0 - 0 D
50%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.9 vs 45.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Ilves averaging 1.1 and Lahti averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Lahti's backline outperforms Ilves's, with 0.5 goals conceded per match versus 1.0.

Ilves has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Lahti has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 1.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Lahti has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Lahti. In practical terms, Lahti would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Lahti, with a 7.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-26), Ilves prevailed 1-0 against Lahti. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Ilves secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Lahti will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ilves will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ilves

Ilves

VS
Lahti

Lahti

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Ilves

4W 1D 5L · 11 goals scored · 10 conceded

Lahti

5W 3D 2L · 11 goals scored · 5 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or