FK IMT vs Javor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare FK IMT vs Javor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
FK IMT
Home Team
Javor
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
FK IMT
Draw
Javor
Statistical Comparison
6W, 4D, 0L
3W, 3D, 4L
14 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
+11
-3
7 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.6
League Difficulty: 54.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: 0.0
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1
Attack: 47.5, Defense: 91.6, Form: 61.1
Attack: 53.7, Defense: 36.9, Form: 30.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
FK IMT
Javor
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (51.8 vs 50.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
The attacking output of FK IMT and Javor is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.4 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.
Defensively, FK IMT is far superior, conceding just 0.3 goals per match with 7 clean sheets, while Javor leaks 1.9 goals per match.
FK IMT has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Javor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
FK IMT is a strong road performer with a 80% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 2.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: FK IMT has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.2 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. FK IMT is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Javor shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 23.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for FK IMT. In practical terms, FK IMT would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, FK IMT holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 66.2 against 42.4 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the Serbian Super Liga (2026-05-03). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
FK IMT
Javor
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
FK IMT
6W 4D 0L · 14 goals scored · 3 conceded
Javor
3W 3D 4L · 16 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams