Skip to content
Compare FK IMT vs Napredak

FK IMT vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare FK IMT vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

FK IMT FK IMT Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
FK IMT
66.2
W W D W D D W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
34.0
W L D W L L L L L L

Performance Radar

FK IMT
Napredak

Categories Won

11

FK IMT

2

Draw

2

Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 4D, 0L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.3

3 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+11

+11

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Keïta (3 goals)
M. Vulić (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.6

53.6

League Difficulty: 54.0, Opponent Quality: 53.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.4

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: 0.0

0.57

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
66.2

Attack: 47.5, Defense: 91.6, Form: 61.1

34.0

Attack: 20.7, Defense: 51.8, Form: 20.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

1
FK IMT
Napredak
FK IMT

Power Rating Breakdown

66.2

Overall

Attack 47.5
Defense 91.6
Form 61.1
Consistency 71.2
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

34.0

Overall

Attack 20.7
Defense 51.8
Form 20.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 54.0

Opponent Quality

49.6 vs 53.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
FK IMT logo FK IMT
W
Zemun (50%)
W
Čukarički (51%)
D
TSC (53%)
W
Spartak (28%)
D
Radnički Krag (52%)
D
Javor (52%)
W
Radnički Niš (51%)
W
Napredak (41%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Dubočica (43%)
L
Mladost Lučani (65%)
D
Radnički Krag (52%)
W
Spartak (28%)
L
Radnički Niš (51%)
L
Javor (52%)
L
FK IMT (66%)
L
TSC (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zemun H
4 - 0 W
50%
Čukarički A
1 - 0 W
51%
TSC H
1 - 1 D
53%
Spartak A
1 - 0 W
28%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%
Javor A
0 - 0 D
52%
Radnički Niš H
2 - 0 W
51%
Napredak A
1 - 0 W
41%
Mladost Lučani H
1 - 1 D
60%
TSC A
3 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dubočica H
1 - 0 W
43%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 1 L
65%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
28%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
51%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
52%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
66%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
58%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
65%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
53%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 51.8 vs 53.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, FK IMT outperforms Napredak with 1.4 goals per match to 0.6, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

FK IMT holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.3 goals per game and recording 7 clean sheets, compared to Napredak's leaky backline that surrenders 1.5 goals per match.

FK IMT has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Napredak has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

FK IMT is a strong road performer with a 80% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 1.9 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

📈 Form Momentum: FK IMT has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.2 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Napredak is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. FK IMT is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Napredak shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 32.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for FK IMT. In practical terms, FK IMT would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, FK IMT is the clear and dominant favorite. With a power rating of 66.2 vs 34.0, and superior metrics across the board, FK IMT should win this comfortably.

In the Serbian Super Liga (2026-04-23), FK IMT beat Napredak 0-1. League results are the most consistent indicator of form, and this result speaks volumes about the current dynamic between these teams. Notably, FK IMT achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Napredak shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Napredak will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. FK IMT will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

FK IMT

FK IMT

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

FK IMT

6W 4D 0L · 14 goals scored · 3 conceded

Napredak

2W 1D 7L · 6 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or