Indonesia vs Nepal Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Indonesia vs Nepal: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Nepal
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Indonesia
Draw
Nepal
Statistical Comparison
2W, 1D, 3L
1W, 0D, 4L
8 / 6 matches
3 / 5 matches
18 / 6 matches
9 / 5 matches
-10
-6
0 / 6 matches
0 / 5 matches
4 / 6 matches
3 / 5 matches
4 / 6 matches
2 / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 2 matches
1W / 1 matches
1W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 70.2
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 65.0
1W / 3 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.37
Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.14
Attack: 49.7, Defense: 0.0, Form: 37.9
Attack: 21.0, Defense: 41.9, Form: 21.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Nepal
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (64.8 vs 54.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Indonesia holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Nepal's 0.6, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Nepal — 1.8 goals conceded per game and 0 clean sheets put them well ahead of Indonesia, who give up 3.0 goals per match at the other end.
Indonesia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Indonesia is a strong road performer with a 100% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: Indonesia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 6 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Nepal is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Indonesia's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
In their recent Internationals Women match (2025-11-26), Indonesia prevailed 2-1 against Nepal. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Indonesia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Nepal will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Indonesia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Indonesia
Nepal
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Indonesia
2W 1D 3L · 8 goals scored · 18 conceded
Nepal
1W 0D 4L · 3 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams