Indonesia vs China Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Indonesia vs China: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Indonesia
Home Team
China
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Indonesia
Draw
China
Statistical Comparison
5W, 1D, 4L
3W, 1D, 2L
17 / 10 matches
5 / 6 matches
11 / 10 matches
4 / 6 matches
+6
+1
6 / 10 matches
3 / 6 matches
5 / 10 matches
1 / 6 matches
1 / 10 matches
1 / 6 matches
5W / 8 matches
2W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
1W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 74.0, Opponent Quality: 59.6
League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7
1W / 3 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.29
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.04
Attack: 61.6, Defense: 68.8, Form: 54.4
Attack: 29.4, Defense: 84.5, Form: 55.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Indonesia
China
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 58.7 vs 60.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Indonesia leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to China's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, China holds the advantage — allowing just 0.7 goals per game against Indonesia's 1.1.
Indonesia has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.1 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.
📈 Form Momentum: Indonesia has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: China's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - Asia (2025-06-05): Indonesia defeated China 1-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates Indonesia's ability to perform on the biggest stage against China. Indonesia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. China will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Indonesia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Indonesia
China
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Indonesia
5W 1D 4L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded
China
3W 1D 2L · 5 goals scored · 4 conceded
Popular Teams