Skip to content
Compare Inter Turku vs TPS

Inter Turku vs TPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Inter Turku vs TPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Inter Turku Inter Turku Home Team
TPS TPS Away Team
Inter Turku
50.0
D D W D D W W W L D

Last 10 Matches

TPS
48.6
D W D W L L W L W D

Performance Radar

Inter Turku
TPS

Categories Won

4

Inter Turku

5

Draw

6

TPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Conteh (4 goals)
A. Muzaci (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.5

League Difficulty: 61.5, Opponent Quality: 59.6

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.28

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.08

1.33

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
50.0

Attack: 38.2, Defense: 70.0, Form: 38.2

48.6

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

2

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

2

76-90+'

3
Inter Turku
TPS
Inter Turku

Power Rating Breakdown

50.0

Overall

Attack 38.2
Defense 70.0
Form 38.2
Consistency 63.7
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 60.7
Form 38.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

61.5 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

59.6 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Inter Turku logo Inter Turku
D
TPS (54%)
D
Copenhagen (75%)
W
Oulu (43%)
D
Vaduz (62%)
D
Lahti (54%)
W
Vaduz (58%)
W
VPS (55%)
W
Başakşehir (68%)
TPS logo TPS
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
VPS (55%)
D
KuPS (48%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
Ilves (44%)
W
Oulu (38%)
L
SJK (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
TPS A
0 - 0 D
54%
Copenhagen H
0 - 0 D
75%
Oulu A
3 - 2 W
43%
Vaduz A
2 - 2 D
62%
Lahti H
0 - 0 D
54%
Vaduz H
2 - 1 W
58%
VPS A
1 - 0 W
55%
Başakşehir H
2 - 0 W
68%
Gnistan H
1 - 2 L
54%
Başakşehir A
1 - 1 D
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
VPS A
3 - 1 W
55%
KuPS A
1 - 1 D
48%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
29%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
60%
Ilves H
1 - 3 L
44%
Oulu H
3 - 0 W
38%
SJK A
1 - 3 L
44%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
33%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
59%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.5 vs 45.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

TPS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.5 goals per game compared to Inter Turku's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Inter Turku's backline outperforms TPS's, with 0.8 goals conceded per match versus 1.1.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Inter Turku has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: TPS's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Finnish Veikkausliiga (2026-08-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Inter Turku

Inter Turku

VS
TPS

TPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Inter Turku

4W 5D 1L · 12 goals scored · 8 conceded

TPS

4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or