Skip to content
Compare Israel vs Lithuania

Israel vs Lithuania Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Israel vs Lithuania: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Israel Israel Home Team
Lithuania Lithuania Away Team
Israel
53.8
W D W D L L L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Lithuania
30.3
L W L D L L L D L D

Performance Radar

Israel
Lithuania

Categories Won

11

Israel

3

Draw

1

Lithuania

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

10%

1W, 3D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-13

-13

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Peretz (3 goals)
G. Gineitis (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.7

League Difficulty: 83.0, Opponent Quality: 61.3

55.2

League Difficulty: 83.0, Opponent Quality: 62.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

0.69

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
53.8

Attack: 66.3, Defense: 45.4, Form: 52.4

30.3

Attack: 21.0, Defense: 38.6, Form: 10.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

3
5

46-60'

3

61-75'

1
6

76-90+'

1
Israel
Lithuania
Israel

Power Rating Breakdown

53.8

Overall

Attack 66.3
Defense 45.4
Form 52.4
Consistency 45.7
Lithuania

Power Rating Breakdown

30.3

Overall

Attack 21.0
Defense 38.6
Form 10.5
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

83.0 vs 83.0

Opponent Quality

61.3 vs 62.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Israel logo Israel
W
Albania (64%)
D
Georgia (59%)
W
Moldova (40%)
D
Lithuania (50%)
L
Italy (86%)
L
Norway (72%)
L
Italy (81%)
W
Moldova (44%)
Lithuania logo Lithuania
L
Georgia (54%)
W
Moldova (42%)
L
Netherlands (79%)
D
Israel (64%)
L
Poland (69%)
L
Finland (58%)
L
Netherlands (74%)
D
Malta (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Albania A
1 - 0 W
64%
Georgia A
2 - 2 D
59%
Moldova H
4 - 1 W
40%
Lithuania A
0 - 0 D
50%
Italy A
0 - 3 L
86%
Norway A
0 - 5 L
72%
Italy H
4 - 5 L
81%
Moldova A
4 - 0 W
44%
Slovakia H
1 - 0 W
65%
Estonia A
3 - 1 W
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Georgia H
0 - 2 L
54%
Moldova A
2 - 0 W
42%
Netherlands A
0 - 4 L
79%
Israel H
0 - 0 D
64%
Poland H
0 - 2 L
69%
Finland A
1 - 2 L
58%
Netherlands H
2 - 3 L
74%
Malta H
1 - 1 D
52%
Denmark A
0 - 5 L
79%
Malta A
0 - 0 D
57%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 54.7 vs 55.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Few sides can match Israel in front of goal. Their 1.9 average per fixture tells the story, with D. Peretz driving that output personally responsible for 3 goals this campaign.

Defensively, Israel and Lithuania are evenly matched, allowing 1.7 and 1.9 goals per game respectively.

Israel has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Lithuania has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

📈 Form Momentum: Israel has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Lithuania is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Israel is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Lithuania shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Israel faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Lithuania can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 23.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Israel. In practical terms, Israel would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Israel in this contest. Their superior power rating of 53.8, compared to 30.3 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Internationals (2025-11-13). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Israel

Israel

VS
Lithuania

Lithuania

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Israel

5W 2D 3L · 19 goals scored · 17 conceded

Lithuania

1W 3D 6L · 6 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or